Laserfiche WebLink
Investigation of the Fate of Individual Sewage Disposal System Effluent <br />in Turkey Creek Basin, Colorado <br />Excerpted from CWRRI Completion Report No. 200, May 13, 2004 <br />By Kathy Dano, Eileen Poeter, and Geoff Thyne <br />Colorado School of Mines <br />w ith rapid development and population growth in the <br />Turkey Creek Basin (TCB) of Jefferson County, Colo- <br />rado, the degradation of water quality has become a pressing <br />issue. Residents of TCB are served by a fractured, crystal- <br />line -rock- aquifer, typical of those in the western US that <br />provide water to residential users through individual domestic <br />wells and treat wastewater with individual sewage disposal <br />systems (ISDSs). Comparison to basin -scale geochemical <br />data from the 1970s and recent geochemical data from TCB <br />reveals that specific conductivity (an indicator of water qual- <br />ity) in the surface water has increased by a factor of 3.3 (see <br />Table 1) over the past 30 years. Specific conductivity in the <br />majority of the ground water has increased by a factor of only <br />1.2 over the same time period. However, specific conductiv- <br />ity of ground water in localized areas has increased by a larger <br />factor. This study investigates the role of ISDS effluent in <br />the degradation of the basin's water quality by investigating <br />the flow path and chemical evolution of ISDS effluent after it <br />leaves the infiltration area of one individual sewage treatment <br />system. <br />Geophysical methods located the ISDS effluent plume of a <br />s' 1 h <br />Table 1. Comparison of water chemistry data from the 1970s (Hostra and Hall, <br />1975) and the late 1990s (Bossong et al., 2003). <br />1 14 <br />tng a ome at the regohth- bedrock <br />interface beneath and adjacent to an <br />ISDS infiltration area. Shallow pie - <br />someters were installed to measure <br />hydraulic properties and monitor <br />water level and quality. A water <br />budget was calculated for the ISDS <br />system to estimate the bedrock infil- <br />tration rate. The home had a typical <br />household pumpage of 644 L /day <br />(170 gallons /day) of which —72 %, an <br />average of 444L /day (123 gallons/ <br />day), was dosed into the infiltration <br />area from the septic tank. The low <br />return rate is unexpected; an ongoing <br />study is evaluating this finding. <br />Under typical conditions, the efflu- <br />ent infiltrates the fractured bedrock <br />within 5 meters of the infiltration <br />area, rather than migrating laterally <br />through the regolith to the closest <br />surface water, North Turkey Creek, <br />which is 500 m away. During an <br />unusually high spring runoff the <br />plume migrated 50 to 100 m within <br />the regolith before infiltrating the <br />fractured bedrock. <br />The chemical fingerprint of the ef- <br />fluent is similar to the anthropogenic <br />component required to account for <br />the ground water quality decline <br />as indicated by other studies. The <br />chemical fingerprint of the effluent <br />has a chemical signature similar to <br />surface water near the mouth of the <br />basin suQeestine that it contrih„tP.q to <br />Ground Water <br />1975 <br />1999 <br />Parameter <br />unit <br />mean <br />median <br /># of <br />samples <br />mean <br /># of <br />median samples <br />Specific Conductivity <br />µS /cm <br />288 <br />256 <br />291 <br />330 <br />313 <br />363 <br />Calcium <br />mg/L <br />40 <br />34 <br />40 <br />39 <br />36 <br />269 <br />Magnesium <br />mg/L <br />10 <br />8 <br />40 <br />9 <br />8 <br />270 <br />Sodium <br />mg/L <br />26 <br />16 <br />40 <br />16 <br />11 <br />270 <br />Potassium <br />mg/L <br />2 <br />2 <br />259 <br />2 <br />2 <br />142 <br />Alkalinity <br />mg/L <br />181 <br />173 <br />6 <br />118 <br />120 <br />273 <br />Sulfate <br />mg/L <br />16 <br />11 <br />40 <br />22 <br />12 <br />273 <br />Chloride <br />mg/L <br />9 <br />4 <br />291 <br />25 <br />7 <br />269 <br />Fluoride <br />mg/L <br />1 <br />0 <br />40 <br />1 <br />1 <br />242 <br />Nitrogen (NO3 + NO2) <br />mg/L <br />2 <br />1 <br />288 <br />2 <br />1 <br />309 <br />Surface Water <br />1975 <br />1999 <br />Parameter <br />unit <br />mean <br />median <br /># of <br />samples <br />mean <br />median <br /># of <br />samples <br />Specific Conductivity <br />µS /cm <br />179 <br />139 <br />25 <br />596 <br />457 <br />78 <br />Calcium <br />mg/L <br />16 <br />141 <br />24 <br />72 <br />42 <br />56 <br />Magnesium <br />mg/L <br />4 <br />3 <br />24 <br />16 <br />10 <br />56 <br />Sodium <br />mg/L <br />8 <br />7 <br />24 <br />36 <br />28 <br />56 <br />Potassium <br />mg/L <br />2 <br />1 <br />24 <br />3 <br />3 <br />34 <br />Alkalinity <br />mg/L <br />75 <br />61 <br />28 <br />115 <br />99 <br />58 <br />Sulfate <br />mg/L <br />8 <br />8 <br />24 <br />71 <br />13 <br />58 <br />Chloride <br />mg/L <br />9 <br />6 <br />79 <br />65 <br />58 <br />Fluoride <br />mg/L <br />1 <br />0 <br />J23 <br />1 <br />0 <br />55 <br />Nitrogen (NO3 + NO2) <br />mg/L <br />0 <br />0 <br />1 <br />0 <br />47 <br />Table 1. Comparison of water chemistry data from the 1970s (Hostra and Hall, <br />1975) and the late 1990s (Bossong et al., 2003). <br />1 14 <br />tng a ome at the regohth- bedrock <br />interface beneath and adjacent to an <br />ISDS infiltration area. Shallow pie - <br />someters were installed to measure <br />hydraulic properties and monitor <br />water level and quality. A water <br />budget was calculated for the ISDS <br />system to estimate the bedrock infil- <br />tration rate. The home had a typical <br />household pumpage of 644 L /day <br />(170 gallons /day) of which —72 %, an <br />average of 444L /day (123 gallons/ <br />day), was dosed into the infiltration <br />area from the septic tank. The low <br />return rate is unexpected; an ongoing <br />study is evaluating this finding. <br />Under typical conditions, the efflu- <br />ent infiltrates the fractured bedrock <br />within 5 meters of the infiltration <br />area, rather than migrating laterally <br />through the regolith to the closest <br />surface water, North Turkey Creek, <br />which is 500 m away. During an <br />unusually high spring runoff the <br />plume migrated 50 to 100 m within <br />the regolith before infiltrating the <br />fractured bedrock. <br />The chemical fingerprint of the ef- <br />fluent is similar to the anthropogenic <br />component required to account for <br />the ground water quality decline <br />as indicated by other studies. The <br />chemical fingerprint of the effluent <br />has a chemical signature similar to <br />surface water near the mouth of the <br />basin suQeestine that it contrih„tP.q to <br />