My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Western States Water Council 2001 Report
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Western States Water Council 2001 Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 1:50:22 PM
Creation date
2/6/2013 3:42:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2005
Title
Western States Water Council Annual Report 2005
Author
Western States Water Council
Description
Annual Report 2005
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
recharge is around 7.5Maf and about half that is incidental to irrigation. At one time the accepted <br />irrigation practice was to divert and apply enough water to bring the water table up to the root zone. <br />The advent of sprinkler irrigation systems in the 1960s significantly reduced labor, energy demands <br />and water use — but also greatly reduced the artificially enhanced recharge, while increasing ground <br />water pumping. Today nearly 75% of the land is irrigated with sprinklers and center pivots, which <br />can be run remotely from a laptop computer. The impact on the aquifer has been dramatic, with <br />discharges down from a peak of 6,800 cubic feet per second (cfs) in the 1950s to 5,200 cfs today. <br />Conflicts between senior surface water rights and junior ground water users had also grown <br />as changes in the nature of use and the hydrologic connection between surface and ground waters <br />have become apparent. The state was in the difficult position of trying to define the impacts of <br />junior uses on senior rights and administer both according to priority. Moreover, state water law <br />provides that senior water users may not make a "futile call" for water where shutting off junior users <br />would not make a significant amount of water available to the senior users. In the case of ground <br />water, the impacts of pumping and shutting down the pumps had a delayed temporal effect. The <br />state had used a ground water flow model, jointly developed with participation by all the affected <br />parties, to determine expected temporal impacts and make decisions. Further, Idaho's state water <br />plan and water policies are designed to "promote the optimum management and utilization of the <br />state's water resources," with a goal to "secure greater productivity, in both monetary and <br />nonmonetary terms, from existing water supplies." This raised the issue of how best to use ESPA <br />ground water resources, while protecting senior surface water rights. <br />On April 19, Karl Dreher issued an order in response to a call for water from seven canal <br />companies and irrigation districts with senior surface water rights in the Magic Valley that would <br />curtail the exercise of all ground water uses with a priority date of February 27, 1979 that affect the <br />irrigation of 80,810 acres of land in two water districts over the ESPA. The ground water districts <br />had until April 29 to try and find 133,400 of to satisfy the call with "replacement water," rather than <br />curtail their use, and must file their plans with IDWR for approval. Plans would be reviewed and <br />approved or disallowed by May 6. Orders responding to other delivery calls in the Thousand Springs <br />were expected in the coming weeks. <br />Bill Rinne, Deputy Commissioner of the Bureau of Reclamation and Director of Operations, <br />also addressed members. He noted that the current system of dams and reservoirs was doing an <br />"amazing job," given the drought, in continuing to meet water supply and delivery demands. The <br />Colorado River system can hold about a 4 -year supply, and was still about half full after years of <br />drought. Is the drought over? We don't know. What will happen after the drought breaks? Will <br />we still have water supply issues? Do we have enough water? These questions had yet to be <br />answered, but they were making "pretty good" progress improving water management. He described <br />Interior's Water 2025 program, Reclamation's Field Services Program and related Challenge Grants. <br />He also discussed the critical need for investment in aging infrastructure, dam safety and drought <br />response authority, as well as other priorities. <br />The Council adopted a position statement in the form of a letter to Senator Pete Domenici and <br />other western congressmen calling for enactment of S. 648, S. 802 and H.R. 1386. The latter bills <br />refer to the National Drought Preparedness Act, which would establish a National Drought Council <br />and a national drought planning and preparedness policy.' The former bill would extend authorities <br />in the Reclamation States Drought Assistance Act. The Council also recommended changes to be <br />forwarded (by request) to the Western Governors' Association (WGA) with respect to an updated <br />resolution on Arid West Water Quality Issues. <br />'Western States Water, Issue #1613, April 15, 2005. <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.