My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Special Report of the Operations Secretary
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Special Report of the Operations Secretary
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 1:44:11 PM
Creation date
2/6/2013 2:46:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2003
Title
Special Report of the Operations Secretary
Author
Arkansas River Compact Adminstration
Description
Concerning processes to resolve administrative issues, the status of issues, and a proposal to alternate the offices of operations secretary and assistant operations secretary 12/8/2003
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
remained constant until all account releases were concluded on July 4, 2002. This fact allows the <br />reasonable assumption that the conveyance response of the river was the same following the <br />conclusion of the release on July 4, 2002 as if the Section.II release had ended on that date. <br />Therefore, one may still evaluate the delivery over a 7 day period in order to allow for the arrival <br />of the receding release wave following the end of the actual Section II release simply by <br />extracting the Offset Account affected period of Stateline flow from the record. In order to do <br />this I have used a period of two days for both the initial arrival of water released from Kansas <br />accounts and for the initial arrival of the first water released from the Offset Account. I also <br />assigned full credit for delivery of all Offset Account released on July 4, 2002. Please refer to the <br />enclosed Transit Loss Worksheet to review how I determined that a transit loss of 676 a.f <br />occurred as a consequence of Kansas' can for delivery of its Section II account water beginning <br />on June 17, 2002. <br />I have directed that this deficit shall be made up from the transfers of water that occurred on <br />March 15, 2003, under Section III D of the Resolution, even though Kansas continued calling for <br />releases of water despite an advisory provided pursuant to Section II E (5) of the Resolution, on <br />June 24, 2002. <br />Finally, i dispute the assertion that an agreement has been reached concerning the disposition of <br />any water that may be provided to make up for delivery deficits. Neither the Administration nor <br />the Operations Committee has taken any action to amend or interpret the Resolution in a manner <br />conforming to your position. Therefore, the Operations Secretary's accounting shows that a <br />transfer of 676 a.f was made to the transit loss account in addition to the usual 1700 a.f., <br />consistent with my understanding of Section III D of the Resolution. <br />Should you have any questions, please feel free to call this office. <br />Sincerely, <br />'Steven J. Witte <br />Operations Secretary <br />Arkansas River Compact Administration <br />Enclosures —3 <br />Cc: Hal Simpson <br />David Pope d ,, ► i �.� /l.vJ f,r yl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.