My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
The State of Colorado's Watersheds Report 2005
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
The State of Colorado's Watersheds Report 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 1:37:39 PM
Creation date
2/6/2013 12:56:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2005
Title
The State of Colorado's Watersheds Report
Author
Colorado Watershed Assembly
Description
2005
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
watershed news <br />Sediment is the biggest water <br />quality problem in the Colorado River <br />basin, according to the Colorado Water <br />Quality Control Division. The soils of <br />western Colorado are already prone <br />to washing into the streams and they <br />have been getting a lot of help from us <br />over the years. Any disturbance that <br />exposes the ground to the elements <br />invites erosion. <br />The EPA and State Water Quality <br />Control Division require anyone who <br />disturbs more than an acre of land to file <br />for a Storm Water Discharge Permit. <br />They have to provide a plan showing <br />how the site will be graded and how <br />sediment or other pollutants from the <br />construction site will be caught and <br />kept from contaminating our rivers <br />and streams. These Best Management <br />Practices (BMP's) are an accepted <br />part of land development. Developers <br />who fail to comply or maintain their <br />sites find the fines and penalties can <br />be substantial. <br />Unbelievably, the oil and gas <br />industry has, up until now, managed <br />to keep themselves exempt from these <br />same permits and requirements. That <br />exemption recently expired and EPA <br />decided that the industry should get <br />another extension of their exemption. <br />Back in March the Colorado Water <br />Quality Control Commission decided <br />otherwise. The oil and gas industry is <br />the largest single land developer in <br />Colorado. For this one industry to be <br />exempt while all other land developers <br />must comply is simply not justifiable. <br />The WQCC felt that way and voted to <br />make the Oil and Gas industry comply <br />with Storm Water discharge permits as <br />of June 30, 2005. <br />COGA (Colorado Oil and Gas <br />Association) and CPA (Colorado <br />Petroleum Association) are now suing <br />to get that ruling overturned. Their <br />primary claim is that there has been no <br />evidence presented showing that oil and <br />gas activities specifically contribute to <br />storm water runoff problems. <br />On the face of it, the COGA /CPA <br />argument is absurd. How is a drilling <br />pad, created by earthmoving equipment, <br />different from any other construction <br />site using the same equipment to create <br />the same kind of disturbance? It isn't. <br />The erodable soils of western Colorado <br />don't care who owns the bulldozer. <br />We all recognize the need for oil <br />and gas. That doesn't mean that this <br />industry is somehow unique and <br />special, deserving of special favors. <br />The oil and gas industry is playing <br />a huge part in western Colorado's <br />economy and communities. The least <br />they can do is be good neighbors and <br />play by the same rules as everyone <br />else. Colorado's rivers, streams and <br />wetlands deserve better treatment from <br />an industry that is getting so much from <br />our watersheds. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.