Laserfiche WebLink
FIGURES <br />Page <br />5 -17 <br />Example of how a river cross section could be modified by the clearing <br />and leveling of a river island ........ ............................... <br />5 -55 <br />5 -18 <br />Average open view widths at managed locations at year 13 under each <br />alternative compared with the Present Condition ........................ <br />5 -67 <br />5 -19 <br />Comparison of the mean monthly specific conductance of the South <br />Platte River at the Julesburg, Colorado, gauge for the Present <br />Condition with that of the action alternatives ........................... <br />5 -77 <br />5 -20 <br />Estimated sediment load of the North Platte and South Platte Rivers <br />near the city of North Platte, and in the Platte River at Lexington <br />and Chapman, Nebraska, for each of six alternatives ..................... <br />5 -97 <br />5 -21 <br />Comparison of least tern timing of nest initiation for the Present <br />Condition and all alternatives <br />5 <br />5 -22 <br />........ ............................... <br />Comparison of least tern nesting opportunity (lack of inundation) <br />-114 <br />for the Present Condition and all alternatives ........................... <br />5 -115 <br />5 -23 <br />Comparison of least tern (managed 1 year) elevation potential <br />(availability of nest sites) for the Present Condition and <br />all alternatives .................... ............................... <br />5 -116 <br />5 -24 <br />Comparison of least tern (unmanaged 1 year) elevation potential <br />(availability of nest sites) for the Present Condition and <br />all alternatives .................... ............................... <br />5 -117 <br />5 -25 <br />Comparison of least tern (managed 3 years) elevation potential <br />(availability of nest sites) for the Present Condition and <br />all alternatives .................... ............................... <br />5 -118 <br />5 -26 <br />Comparison of least tern (unmanaged 3 years) elevation potential <br />(availability of nest sites) for the Present Condition and <br />all alternatives .................... ............................... <br />5 -119 <br />5 -27 <br />Comparison of piping plover timing of nest initiation for the <br />Present Condition and all alternatives <br />5 <br />5 -28 <br />. ............................... <br />Comparison of piping plover nesting opportunity (lack in <br />-125 <br />inundation) for the Present Condition and all alternatives ................. <br />5 -126 <br />5 -29 <br />Comparison of piping plover (managed 1 year) sandbar (nest) <br />elevation potential (availability of nest sites) for the Present <br />5 -30 <br />Condition and all alternatives ........ ............................... <br />Comparison of piping plover (unmanaged 1 year) sandbar (nest) <br />5 -127 <br />elevation potential (availability of nest sites) for the Present <br />Condition and all alternatives <br />5 -31 <br />........ ............................... <br />Comparison of piping plover (managed 3 years) sandbar (nest) <br />5 -128 <br />potential (availability of nest sites) for the Present Condition <br />and all alternatives ................ ............................... <br />5 -129 <br />xvii <br />