My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Threats to Wildlife and the Platte River
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Threats to Wildlife and the Platte River
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2013 3:03:54 PM
Creation date
1/31/2013 11:50:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
relates to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
3/1/1989
Author
National Audubon Society
Title
Threats to Wildlife and the Platte River Environmental Policy Analysis Department Report #33
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
p. 14 WILDLIFE <br />population occurs in the Big Bend area between Kearney and Grand Island. Most of the remaining <br />cranes use the Overton -to -Elm Creek and Sutherland -to -North Platte areas, with some congregating <br />at the Lewellen area upstream of Lake McConaughy on the North Platte (USFWS 1981, p 19). <br />The length of river that Sandhill Cranes now occupy "is markedly reduced from former <br />periods. Cranes have abandoned the 60.5 - mile... reach between the Tri- County Canal intake and <br />its discharge site near Overton. Much of this reach was probably lost in the decade immediately <br />following dewatering of much of the channel in 1941... (T)he advanced development of woody <br />vegetation at many sites along this reach has resulted in a disjunct crane distribution" ( Krapu 1982, <br />p 546). East of Kearney, to Grand Island, the channel remains relatively wide, averaging 200 yards, <br />and approximately 300,000 cranes use the area for roosting ( Krapu 1982, p 546). Table 2A details <br />the relationship between channel width and Sandhill Crane use. Cranes show a clear preference <br />for wide channels; 70 percent of crane use occurred in channels wider than 166 yards even though <br />these channels made up only 25 percent of the available habitat ( Krapu 1981). <br />Table 2A <br />Relationship Between Channel Width and Sandhill Crane Use <br />Channel Width % Crane Use % Of River Available <br />0 -54 yards (0 -49 m) 1 18 <br />55 -165 yards (50 -150 m) 29 57 <br />166+ yards (151+ m) 70 25 <br />(Source: Currier et al. 1985, p 41. from Krapu 1981). <br />A good case in point is when cranes stopped using roosts on the Red River in Oklahoma <br />during the winter of 1969 -1970 when woody growth constricted most of the channel to less than <br />100 meters (Lewis 1976 in Krapu et al. 1984). Although "cranes will temporarily roost on dry land <br />when wetland sites are not available, [s]ites lacking a water barrier ...do not provide secure roosting <br />habitat for staging cranes" ( Krapu et al. 1984). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.