Laserfiche WebLink
the data available, including the number of crane sightings as well as the <br />number of cranes. <br />B.6. Platte River Objectives <br />Although it is recommended that 100 percent of the recovered AWP should be <br />managed for in the central Platte River area, it is recognized that birds pass over the <br />upper Platte River now, and some provisions for their habitat stopover needs should <br />not be excluded. Suitable riverine stopover habitat in the upper Platte River, as well <br />as the central Platte River, may be particularly important during drought cycles <br />where such areas may be the only ones available in that part of Nebraska. One or <br />more habitat developments could be provided for whooping cranes west of the <br />central Platte River although the feasibility of such habitat work may be <br />questionable. In areas where river channel roost habitat is not restorable, it may be <br />beneficial to manage roosting habitat in restored wetlands off the river. Such <br />concepts should be studied and analyzed thoroughly prior to making decisions. <br />Nevertheless, the priority for whooping crane habitat restoration and management on <br />the Platte River should focus on the central Platte River. This is because the <br />majority of whooping crane stopovers occur on the central Platte River and that is <br />where habitat management can be most beneficial (river channel, wet meadow, and <br />flow management). <br />If it is determined at a future time that some habitat development and management is <br />feasible in the upper Platte River area, a 90:10 split in terms of the proportion of <br />whooping crane use or stopovers could be selected as a revised objective at that <br />time. That is, management could occur for 90 percent of whooping crane stopovers <br />on the central Platte River and for 10 percent of stopovers west of the central Platte <br />River. The rationale for the 90:10 split is that if 10 habitat complexes are developed <br />along bridge segments from Lexington to Chapman, as currently proposed, and if at <br />least one habitat development occurred west of the central Platte River, then roughly <br />90 percent of new recovered suitable habitat would be available in the central Platte <br />River and 10 percent would be available west of the central Platte River. Again, this <br />report stresses that existing suitable habitat should remain on the central Platte River <br />exclusive of future restored and managed habitat. <br />B.7. Managing for the Population Objective <br />B.7.1. Population Ratios <br />Population ratios are difficult to establish and monitor because the detection of <br />bird stopovers varies with effort and the efficiency of detecting stopovers is really <br />not known. Recognizing this problem, this report recommends that population <br />ratios provided by Dr. Doug Johnson be used as indices of whooping crane use of <br />the Platte River and to estimate the potential changes in use. Separate ratios <br />could be selected for fall and spring populations. For the fall, the peak winter <br />population at Aransas NWR (typically in December) should be used. For the <br />spring, the number of birds departing Aransas should be used. The ratios should <br />be calculated using "confirmed" and "probable" sightings on the Platte River <br />separately and possibly combine them, if beneficial. Combining "confirmed" and <br />041 <br />