Laserfiche WebLink
limited and adjacent sand pit habitat provides alternative nesting habitat. River <br />sandbar habitat in the lower Platte River is plentiful in some years and the birds <br />seem to use adjacent sand pit habitat less frequently. Sand pits seem to have <br />influenced the birds' distribution by providing alternative nesting habitat along <br />the river where riverine sandbar habitat is limited. <br />Although some investigation has been conducted on the characteristics of sand pit <br />habitat used by nesting terns and plovers (i.e., Kirsch 1996 compares attributes of <br />used and unused sand pits on the Lower Platte River), there does not appear to be <br />a comprehensive description of sand pit habitat, especially foraging habitat. <br />Therefore, this report recommends that such an investigation be conducted and <br />reported. Specifically, data should be gathered on the characteristics of <br />successful tern and plover nesting and fledging on sand pits along the Platte River <br />(e.g., nesting/fledging data, sand pit size, proximity to the river, area of sand and <br />gravel, surface area of water at the pit site, foraging behavior, time budget and <br />energy expenditure data). In addition, the investigations should assess the <br />features of sand pit habitat that would best facilitate their role in assisting to <br />achieve recovery levels for tems and plovers. <br />It is recommended that all breeding adults and fledged piping plover and least <br />tern chicks, whether they fledge from sand pits or riverine or shoreline habitats, <br />count towards species numbers and fledge rate objectives. <br />A.6.2. Standardized Reporting <br />Managers on the Platte River should standardize reporting of fledge rates by <br />reporting tern and plover chicks per pair rather than chicks per nest. In addition, <br />how numbers of pairs are determined and how numbers of young fledged are <br />determined should be standardized among reporting agencies and organizations. <br />Agencies and organizations are currently reporting census data on the Platte River <br />in different formats (i.e., chicks per nest versus chicks per pair). Most agencies <br />and most of the scientific literature reports chicks per pair. When chicks per nest <br />is used, it assumes no renesting. Since renesting does occur, it is recommended <br />that censuses be done more that once per year and that chicks per pair be reported <br />by all agencies and organizations monitoring terns and plovers on the Platte River <br />as well as on sand pits. How numbers of pairs are determined (pairs counted <br />during census, total number of nests initiated, maximum number of adults <br />observed divided by 2, etc.) and how the number of young fledged are determined <br />should also be standardized. <br />17 <br />