Laserfiche WebLink
The following table shows the average monthly reductions in consumptive use for the <br />1975 -94 period. <br />Table III -10 <br />Conservation Cropping — Reductions in Consumptive Use (ac -ft) <br />Month <br />Reach 16 <br />Reach 17 <br />Reach 18 <br />Reach 19 <br />October <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />November <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />December <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />January <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />February <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />March <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />April <br />6 <br />10 <br />8 <br />5 <br />May <br />12 <br />25 <br />20 <br />-11 <br />June <br />133 <br />277 <br />351 <br />426 <br />July <br />326 <br />801 <br />1052 <br />1221 <br />August <br />300 <br />646 <br />852 <br />1052 <br />September <br />23 <br />45 <br />48 <br />43 <br />Annual <br />799 <br />1804 <br />2330 <br />2758 <br />Based on the water budget spreadsheet, a reduction in consumptive use of 7,700 ac -ft <br />resulted in a yield of 7,000 ac -ft.of shortage reductions at the critical habitat without <br />diversion losses. In this case, it is important to note that flows in the critical habitat will <br />only be increased by reductions in consumptive use. Therefore, the reduction in <br />diversions is considerably higher to account for historic return flows. The modeling <br />being performed by the EIS team may indicate that the yield associated with 7,700 ac -ft <br />of consumptive use savings is higher or lower than 7,000 ac -ft of reductions to target <br />flow shortages. If the EIS modeling indicates a yield that differs from 7,000 ac -ft at the <br />critical habitat, the size of the water management program may require adjustment. This <br />applies to all water management options evaluated. <br />Option 2: Deficit Irrigation Practices <br />A deficit irrigation program would focus on reducing water use in irrigated corn <br />production. The representative deficit irrigation program would reduce irrigation on corn <br />acres by six inches per year. The distribution of land involved in deficit irrigation in each <br />reach was based on the distribution of acres irrigated with surface supplies. The number <br />of acres that were assumed to be included in a deficit irrigation program are summarized <br />in the following table. <br />Table III -11 <br />Deficit Irrigation Program <br />Reach <br />Acres Included in <br />Program (ac) <br />16 <br />2,000 <br />17 <br />4,300 <br />18 <br />5,500 <br />19 <br />4,700 <br />Total <br />16,500 <br />\\DN00\E- DRIVE\PROJECTS\Platte \Work Products\Task 9 \wapc report (Version 7).doc 26 <br />