My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Reconnaissance-Level Water Action Plan
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Reconnaissance-Level Water Action Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 3:46:56 PM
Creation date
1/30/2013 3:15:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
for the Governance Committee of the Cooperative Agreement for Platte River Research (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
9/14/2000
Author
Boyle Engineering Corporation in association with BBC Research & Consulting andAnderson Consulting Engineers
Title
Platte River Research Cooperative Agreement Reconnaissance-Level Water Action Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Option 6: J -2 Forebay Reservoir. This site is located southeast of Lexington in Gosper <br />County in the Plum Creek basin, south of the J -2 Forebay on the south side of the Canal. <br />This reservoir would be gravity fed from the Canal. The reservoir capacity is estimated to <br />be 3,436 ac -ft. <br />0 Basic Description: <br />Re- regulating reservoirs capture Platte River water beyond that required for irrigation <br />deliveries and mainstem instream flows during periods of excess flow at the critical <br />habitat. In general, water would be diverted from the Central District Supply Canal <br />during periods of excess and released during periods of shortage at the critical habitat. In <br />the case of the Jeffrey Canyon and the J -2 Forebay Reservoirs, water would be supplied <br />from Jeffrey Reservoir and the J -2 Forebay, respectively, as opposed to the Canal. <br />CNPPID is proposing to re- regulate flows in their system, in which case diversions will <br />not be increased or decreased, only return flows will change. <br />0 On -Site Hydrologic Effects: <br />The HDR Report was relied on for yield estimates. The on -site yields presented have not <br />been discounted, therefore, the EIS team will need to consider the reservation of water for <br />Nebraska's future depletions in determining the scores associated with these reservoirs. <br />HDR developed a spreadsheet to analyze the flow regime of each potential reservoir. <br />Reservoir operations were modeled on a daily basis. Daily operation is possible due to <br />the close proximity of the reservoirs to the habitat. Days of excess can occur in months <br />that the monthly flow does not exceed monthly target flows, in which case, the reservoirs <br />could be operated to store on days of excess and release on days of shortage. These <br />reservoirs can take advantage of short-term excesses and shortages in a more efficient <br />manner than other alternatives that are further upstream. <br />The following assumptions and operating rules were used by HDR to determine the yield <br />and timing associated with these reservoirs. <br />• No dead pool was accounted for. All reservoirs were allowed to drop until they <br />were dry. <br />• Type of year for purposes of defining target flows (wet, average, or dry) is known. <br />• Travel time from Overton to Grand Island is two days. Historic flows at Overton <br />were used to determine the amount of water that should be stored or released from <br />the reservoirs to meet the target flows at Grand Island. <br />• Buffers were used to incorporate a factor of safety in the decision to store or <br />release. If the flow at Overton was more than 200 cfs above the target flow, then <br />water was diverted to storage. If the flow at Overton was more than 500 cfs below <br />the target flow, then water was released from storage. Changes to these buffers will <br />affect yield results. <br />\ \DN00\E- DRIVE \PROJECTS\Platte \Work Products\Task 9 \wapc report (Version 7).doc 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.