Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />35 <br />samples of cranes from the wild. <br />Table 5. Indices of diversity in population <br />AlleleslPoI morohism <br />H ter z o i <br />Crane & Direct Count' Estimatesb Locus' ercen <br />a Size <br />Sample Size <br />Whooping 0,048 +0.024 0.045 +0.023 1.17 +0.08 20.9 <br />14 <br />Mississippi sandhill <br />0.024 +0.014 <br />0.050 +0.033 1.17 +0.10 12.5 <br />7 <br />Greater sandhill 28 <br />0 .0 67 +0. 0 <br />0.071 +0.031 1.38 +0.13 29.2 <br />17 <br />Florida sandhill <br />(Okefenokee deme) <br />0.028 +0.016 <br />1.13 +0.07 12.5 <br />10 <br />Florida sandhill 0,125 +0.069 <br />0.111 +0.052 1.17 +0.08 27.2 <br />2 <br />Siberian 0.032 +0.016 <br />0.031+0.015 1.17 +0.08 16.7 <br />9 <br />Saurus Crane 0.028+0-019 <br />0.036 +0.026 1.13 +0.09 08.3 <br />6 <br />a Means + I- Standard Error <br />b Unbiased Estimate <br />C 0.99 Criterion <br />captive flock at ICF, Baraboo, <br />roductivity of the whooping crane <br />and <br />Table 6. Size p <br />1989 -1993. <br />Wisconsin, <br />All Females <br />Fertile Chicks Chicks <br />Hatched Fledged <br />Year Birds Laying Eggs <br />Eggs <br />1989 24 0 <br />1990 30 0 9 <br />1 <br />2 2 6 <br />1991 28 3 <br />3 16 <br />8 6 <br />5 4 <br />1992 39 g <br />1993 32 3 <br />5 13 11 <br />15 <br />34 <br />Totals 153 9 <br />