My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WAP 2001-2002 PRRIP
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
WAP 2001-2002 PRRIP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 3:46:55 PM
Creation date
1/28/2013 2:43:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Staff Notebook for Platte River Research Cooperative Agreement (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP) Water Advisory Committee (WAC) Meetings including memos, comments, emails, minutes, letters, agendas, notes, etc. 2001-2002
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
1/1/2001
Author
CWCB Staff
Title
Staff Notebook for Platte River Research Cooperative Agreement Water Advisory Committee (WAC) Meetings for 2001-2002
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
500
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
U-1 <br />Peak Flows <br />O C tnO`f') <br />In the context of the Program, "peak flows" refer to the highest flows ma' fined for five <br />consecutive days in any given year. USFWS peak flow recommendations were presented in <br />Bowman and Carlson, 1994 (see Attachments B and Q. These are summarized as follows: <br />PEAK FLOWS <br />Exceedance probability <br />Recommended flow in cfs <br />Notes <br />(recurrence interval) <br />However, the Service recommends that efforts be made to protect the frequency and mamitude S� <br />of these naturally - occurring peak flows as new water - related activities occur in the Platte River <br />n�� , VL <br />basin. Because the Program is likely to augment the annual peak flow in many lower -flow years, <br />20% (l. in 5 years) <br />16,000 (Feb -Jun) <br />• 5 -day duration <br />existing conditions. <br />• At least 50% of these flows should occur/ <br />Program Target Flows <br />between May 20 to June 20 <br />• May -June preferred for habitat benefits <br />• Feb -June OK for channel maintenance <br />40% (2 in 5 years') <br />12,000 (Feb -Jun) <br />• 5 -day duration <br />10 -year running average <br />8,300 to 10,800 (Feb -Jun) <br />of 5- consecutive -day exceedance <br />`V <br />�o 0 <br />�t <br />�V <br />As described by Bowman and Carlson, the recommended peaks in excess of 12,000 cfs "will be <br />natural occurrences beyond the control of water resources managers in the Platte River basin ". <br />The Program is not will not create nor intentionally augment flows of this magnitude. <br />However, the Service recommends that efforts be made to protect the frequency and mamitude S� <br />of these naturally - occurring peak flows as new water - related activities occur in the Platte River <br />n�� , VL <br />basin. Because the Program is likely to augment the annual peak flow in many lower -flow years, <br />e1�` <br />it is anticipated that the Program will improve the 10 -year running average peak flow relative to`p�" <br />existing conditions. <br />Program Target Flows <br />` <br />Defined as the "species flow" plus the "annual pulse flow" recommendations, as described <br />above. The Program target flows are the flow levels that the Program actively seeks to establish <br />through provision of Program water and re- timing of river flows. Program target flows are used <br />as the basis for "scoring" the water - related benefits of Program activities relative to the 130,000 - <br />150,000 acre - foot /year First - Increment goal for reductions in shortages to targets (see discussion <br />in Section 3).1 <br />1 "Scoring" refers to quantifying (in thousands of acre -feet) the extent to which a water - related activity <br />results (or is anticipated to result) in reductions in stream flow shortages to USFWS recommended flows, as <br />compared to the present condition. Scoring provides one tool for evaluating and comparing the potential benefits of <br />water - related activities in the context of the Program, however it is not the only means of assessing potential benefits <br />and adverse impacts. <br />0 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.