My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WAP 2001-2002 PRRIP
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
WAP 2001-2002 PRRIP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 3:46:55 PM
Creation date
1/28/2013 2:43:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Staff Notebook for Platte River Research Cooperative Agreement (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP) Water Advisory Committee (WAC) Meetings including memos, comments, emails, minutes, letters, agendas, notes, etc. 2001-2002
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
1/1/2001
Author
CWCB Staff
Title
Staff Notebook for Platte River Research Cooperative Agreement Water Advisory Committee (WAC) Meetings for 2001-2002
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
500
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />From: <Donald Anderson @fws.gov> <br />To: <lmyler @gp.usbr.gov >, <jlawson @gp.usbr.gov> <br />Date: 7/5/02 10:34AM <br />Subject: Draft Instream Flow Recommendations Summary document <br />John and Lyle, <br />At the May GC workshop, there was some clamor for additional <br />discussion /clarification of the various Platte "instream flow <br />recommendation" terms being used by the Service and by the Program. <br />In response, we've put together the attached draft document. It attempts <br />to: <br />(1) Clarify the meaning of various instream flow recommendation terms <br />( "peak flows ", "Program target flows ", etc.); <br />(2) Clarify how these flow recommendations have been (and will continue to <br />be) used in the context of various Program - relate 'activities; and <br />(3) Provide some historical context to the origin and use of these terms. <br />Ideally and hopefully there is nothing "new" here. Our intent is to <br />summarize what has already been discussed and agreed to by Program <br />participants. The only "new" part should be doing so in a way that helps <br />clarify the issues. So we're interested in hearing from others as to <br />whether this document gets us part or most of the way there. <br />Two quick comments on the attached files: <br />'(1) Some of the special formatting incorporated into this WordPerfect <br />document (such as text boxes) seem a little touchy so if the printed <br />version is slightly awry, it may be the result of printer reformatting. <br />(In case of confusion, we can always fax the original); <br />(2) "Attachment D" has not (yet) been incorporated into the WordPerfect <br />document itself, so for the time being I am including it as a separate <br />scanned .jpg file (AttachmentD.jpg). <br />I guess Mark Butler and I will be the point persons for feedback on this <br />draft. <br />Thanks, <br />Don Anderson <br />(See attached file: TargetFlowsClarifyJune26.wpd) (See attached file: <br />AttachmentD.jpg) <br />--------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />Don Anderson <br />Hydrologist <br />U.S. Fish & Wildlife Region 6 Water Resources <br />Lakewood, Colorado <br />(303)236 -5322 x231 <br />http: / /www.r6.fws.gov /wtr <br />--------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- <br />CC: <mabutler @prs.usbr.gov >, <cabrown @prs.usbr.gov >, <br /><Bob_McCue @fws.gov >, <CDOUGHERTY @prs.usbr.gov> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.