My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GC 2010 PRRIP
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
GC 2010 PRRIP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2013 11:55:32 AM
Creation date
1/25/2013 4:59:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Platte River Recovery Implementation Program (PRRIP) Governance Committee (GC) Meeting agendas, contracts, emails, budgets, related reports, minutes, notes, etc. 2010
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
1/1/2010
Author
Platte River Recovery Implementation Program (PRRIP)
Title
Platte River Recovery Implementation Program (PRRIP) Governance Committee (GC) Meeting documents for 2010
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
479
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. PRRIP — ED OFFICE DRAFT 6 04/06/2010 <br />214 Program RFPs <br />215 The GC discussed the recommended Proposal Selection Panels for three Program RFPs: <br />216 Directed Vegetation Research <br />217 Recommended panel: C. Smith, Farnsworth, Jenniges, Drain, Czaplewski, Fritz, Hamer <br />218 <br />219 Cottonwood Ranch OCSW & Flow Consolidation Conceptual Design <br />220 Recommended panel: Farnsworth, Jenniges, C. Smith, Rabbe, Besson, Urie, Gold, Heaston <br />222 Wet Meadows Information Review: <br />223 Recommended panel: C. Smith, Baasch, Czaplewski, Heaston, Rabbe, Jenniges, Hallum, Fritz, <br />224 Urie <br />225 <br />226 Taddicken moved to approve the Proposal Selection Panels; Kowalski seconded. Panels <br />227 approved. <br />228 <br />229 Indexing of Program Funds <br />230 Lawson discussed the proposal for indexing Program funds for inflation. Consultation and <br />231 coordination with the Department of the Interior (DOI) Office of the Solicitor and states of <br />232 Colorado and Wyoming has resulted in the development of a methodology that has been <br />233 approved by the DOI and is acceptable to the two states. Indexing will be based on the Bureau of <br />234 Reclamation's Construction Cost Trends (CCT). All land acquisition costs will be indexed using <br />•235 CCT Nebraska Land Index, water conservation/supply projects will be based on the CCT <br />236 General Property Index, and all other Program costs will be based on the Federal Salary Index, <br />237 since they are primarily staff driven. <br />238 <br />239 Of the cash contributions, funding which remains to be expended each October 1St will be <br />240 indexed and NOT the remaining balance of Program funding to be appropriated. The first index <br />241 will be applied on October 1, 2009 per guidance from the DOI Office of the Solicitor. In order to <br />242 maintain the established cost share equality between Federal and State contributions, an index <br />243 adjustment will also be applied to the cast equivalent water and land contributions provided by <br />244 the States. The cash contribution index ratios will also be applied to the cash equivalent <br />245 contributions in order to maintain the cost share equality. <br />246 <br />247 Kowalski asked why Lawson did not take the state contributions out. Lawson said page 2 of <br />248 Program Document Attachment #1 says includes the state contributions as well so they need to <br />249 stay in the calculation. Reclamation approves of and supports this indexing process. Kowalski <br />250 moved to support the indexing process; Purcell seconded. Kowalski said Colorado has a little <br />251 bit of heartburn because of what is specified in the legislation when it was passed, especially in <br />252 light of Colorado sending its contributions into the Nebraska Community Foundation (NCF) for <br />253 the Program. Nevertheless, Lawson has provided a clear and understandable template for talking <br />254 to the Colorado General Assembly about the state's contributions to the Program. Colorado <br />255 believes there is a risk in terms of whether interest will cover the contributions. It seems odd to <br />256 apply an inflationary index to contributions of land and water. Purcell said the reason is the <br />This document is a draft based on one person's notes of the meeting. The official meeting minutes may be different if corrections are <br />made by the Governance Committee before approval. <br />PRRIP GC Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.