Laserfiche WebLink
. PRRIP — ED OFFICE DRAFT 6 04/06/2010 <br />214 Program RFPs <br />215 The GC discussed the recommended Proposal Selection Panels for three Program RFPs: <br />216 Directed Vegetation Research <br />217 Recommended panel: C. Smith, Farnsworth, Jenniges, Drain, Czaplewski, Fritz, Hamer <br />218 <br />219 Cottonwood Ranch OCSW & Flow Consolidation Conceptual Design <br />220 Recommended panel: Farnsworth, Jenniges, C. Smith, Rabbe, Besson, Urie, Gold, Heaston <br />222 Wet Meadows Information Review: <br />223 Recommended panel: C. Smith, Baasch, Czaplewski, Heaston, Rabbe, Jenniges, Hallum, Fritz, <br />224 Urie <br />225 <br />226 Taddicken moved to approve the Proposal Selection Panels; Kowalski seconded. Panels <br />227 approved. <br />228 <br />229 Indexing of Program Funds <br />230 Lawson discussed the proposal for indexing Program funds for inflation. Consultation and <br />231 coordination with the Department of the Interior (DOI) Office of the Solicitor and states of <br />232 Colorado and Wyoming has resulted in the development of a methodology that has been <br />233 approved by the DOI and is acceptable to the two states. Indexing will be based on the Bureau of <br />234 Reclamation's Construction Cost Trends (CCT). All land acquisition costs will be indexed using <br />•235 CCT Nebraska Land Index, water conservation/supply projects will be based on the CCT <br />236 General Property Index, and all other Program costs will be based on the Federal Salary Index, <br />237 since they are primarily staff driven. <br />238 <br />239 Of the cash contributions, funding which remains to be expended each October 1St will be <br />240 indexed and NOT the remaining balance of Program funding to be appropriated. The first index <br />241 will be applied on October 1, 2009 per guidance from the DOI Office of the Solicitor. In order to <br />242 maintain the established cost share equality between Federal and State contributions, an index <br />243 adjustment will also be applied to the cast equivalent water and land contributions provided by <br />244 the States. The cash contribution index ratios will also be applied to the cash equivalent <br />245 contributions in order to maintain the cost share equality. <br />246 <br />247 Kowalski asked why Lawson did not take the state contributions out. Lawson said page 2 of <br />248 Program Document Attachment #1 says includes the state contributions as well so they need to <br />249 stay in the calculation. Reclamation approves of and supports this indexing process. Kowalski <br />250 moved to support the indexing process; Purcell seconded. Kowalski said Colorado has a little <br />251 bit of heartburn because of what is specified in the legislation when it was passed, especially in <br />252 light of Colorado sending its contributions into the Nebraska Community Foundation (NCF) for <br />253 the Program. Nevertheless, Lawson has provided a clear and understandable template for talking <br />254 to the Colorado General Assembly about the state's contributions to the Program. Colorado <br />255 believes there is a risk in terms of whether interest will cover the contributions. It seems odd to <br />256 apply an inflationary index to contributions of land and water. Purcell said the reason is the <br />This document is a draft based on one person's notes of the meeting. The official meeting minutes may be different if corrections are <br />made by the Governance Committee before approval. <br />PRRIP GC Meeting Minutes Page 6 of 11 <br />