My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRRIP Late 2007 to 2008
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
PRRIP Late 2007 to 2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2013 11:37:57 AM
Creation date
1/25/2013 1:49:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Platte River Recovery Implementation Program (PRRIP) Various Documents from 2007 to 2008 including reports, studies, RFPs, proposals, budgets, Governance Committee (GC) meeting documents, and emails.
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
1/1/2007
Author
Platte River Recovery Implementation Program (PRRIP)
Title
Platte River Recovery Implementation Program (PRRIP) Various Documents from 2007 to 2008 and emails.
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0 <br />PRRIP — ED OFFICE FINAL <br />12/10/2007 <br />In accordance with the Program's Adaptive Management Plan (AMP), the study should provide <br />sufficient data to evaluate the effect of changes in river stage over a range of flows on a micro, <br />meso, and macro scale. The following example is provided to help define these terms and <br />provide a framework for the range of flows to be considered and the interval measurements that <br />need to be made: <br />River Gage: Louisville, NE (Station ID 06805500) <br />Range of River Flows: 5,000 cfs to 39,000 cfs (bankfull flows) <br />Precision Level: o con i ence <br />Possible Measurement Interval: Every 1,000 cfs (roughly 0.1 foot of stage change) <br />In responding to this RFP, potential contractors should provide information on the needed <br />methods to obtain this data, the appropriate discharge /stage measurement intervals necessary for <br />achieving the desired level of precision, and the efficacy of applying these methods over a larger <br />range of flows. In addition, potential contractors can use guidance provided by the Program's <br />Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the Final Biological Opinion (BO) to better <br />understand the types of flow changes of concern and the related impact on the identified physical <br />parameters. Copies of the relevant sections of the Final EIS and Final BO can be downloaded <br />from the Program Web site (www.PlatteRiverProgrrain.or ;) or obtained from Chad Smith. <br />Given this framework, the study should provide information sufficient to estimate changes in the <br />• physical parameters identified above, across the identified range of flows and the three scales of <br />measurement intervals, that occur during the study period and as can be determined from historic <br />information. The intent should be to draw inferences to the types of process changes that would <br />occur in the system as a result of river stage changes. <br />a. Information will be sufficient to determine if Program water activities can be statistically <br />identified (significant beyond the error of the gauging equipment) from base flow <br />conditions (AMP Hypothesis X -Y Graph PS -2). <br />b. Information will be sufficient to detect if Program water activities have a statistically <br />significant impact on stage, velocity, temperature, turbidity, substrate, or channel <br />morphology (AMP Hypothesis X -Y Graphs PS -3, PS -4, PS -6, PS -9). <br />This includes an emphasis on floodplain connectivity and the inundation of otherwise terrestrial <br />habitat (not out of the high banks), and how both of these factors vary with flow. <br />Proposals should include the scope, timeline, and budget for developing a detailed protocol for <br />estimating the effects of stage change on the identified physical parameters. The protocol will be <br />reviewed by a selected Program sub -group before being finalized. The final protocol will be in <br />sufficient detail to identify all aspects of data collection, analysis, reporting, and deliverables for <br />the overall project. The final protocol and detailed budget estimate for actual implementation of <br />the protocol will be provided to the appropriate Program sub -group and /or Advisory Committee <br />for review. Approval of the protocol and budget by the Governance Committee is needed prior <br />. to the contractor proceeding with protocol implementation. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.