My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRRIP Late 2007 to 2008
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
PRRIP Late 2007 to 2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2013 11:37:57 AM
Creation date
1/25/2013 1:49:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Platte River Recovery Implementation Program (PRRIP) Various Documents from 2007 to 2008 including reports, studies, RFPs, proposals, budgets, Governance Committee (GC) meeting documents, and emails.
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
1/1/2007
Author
Platte River Recovery Implementation Program (PRRIP)
Title
Platte River Recovery Implementation Program (PRRIP) Various Documents from 2007 to 2008 and emails.
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0 November 6, 2007 <br />Summary of Phase I Whooping Crane Data Analysis <br />Prepared for: <br />Technical Advisory Committee of the Platte River Program and <br />Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. <br />Prepared by: <br />Bureau of Reclamation <br />Conclusion and Recommendation <br />Of the three methods considered: gage data; Manning's equation combined with a ratio; <br />and HECRAS, the HECRAS method using the existing Platte River model is <br />recommended because it provides the most reliable results on water surface change at <br />the greatest number of locations. The HECRAS method uses an explicit computation of <br />physical processes with fewer assumptions in comparison to the Manning's equation/ratio <br />method that is an approximate or empirical computation relying on multiple assumptions. <br />There was also no time savings with the less reliable Manning's equation/ratio method <br />• since it took as much computation time as the HECRAS method. <br />The HECRAS method and gage data method use a cross section instead of a flow ratio <br />and the success of these methods is dependent on the similarity of the computational <br />cross section' to the actual cross section at the Whooping Crane (WC) site. The HECRAS <br />model currently has 58 cross sections providing better opportunity for a match then the <br />single cross sections associated with the 4 gage sites. Because the gage method is simple <br />and fast however, it is recommended as a secondary method or check for purposes of <br />quality control. <br />Two other benefits of the HECRAS method are: <br />• the model provides data in addition to the water surface information, which can be <br />used for the Whooping Crane analysis (velocity, flow area, channel width, water <br />surface depths at alternate locations, etc.); and <br />• although average daily flow data was used for this analysis, water surface <br />variations resulting from large changes in daily flow data and flow travel time can <br />be studied with the HECRAS model if a question at specific sites comes up in the <br />future. <br />1 A cross section traverses the full width of the flood plain, while a transect may traverse less than this <br />distance, i.e. a single channel at locations with multiple channels. <br />Summary of Phase I Whooping Crane Data Analysis November 6, 2007 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.