My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Colorado - Old Dillon Reservoir Enlargement_BRT Approval Letter
CWCB
>
WSRF Grant & Loan Information
>
DayForward
>
ARK - GUNNISON
>
Colorado - Old Dillon Reservoir Enlargement_BRT Approval Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2013 10:41:37 AM
Creation date
12/18/2012 10:58:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
WSRA Grant and Loan Information
Basin Roundtable
Colorado
Applicant
Summit County
Description
Old Dillon Reservoir Enlargement
Account Source
Basin
Board Meeting Date
3/19/2008
Contract/PO #
09000000026
WSRA - Doc Type
Grant Application
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COLORADO BASIN ROUNDTABLE <br />REQUEST FOR WATER SUPPLY RESERVE ACCOUNT <br />2007-2008 GRANT APPLICATION FORM <br /> <br />BALLOT FOR FUND REQUEST <br /> <br />DECEMBER 17,2007 <br />NAME COLORADO BASIN ROUNDTABLE <br />REPRESENTING <br /> <br />PROJECT NAME <br /> <br />SB-179- <br />BASIN <br />FUNDS <br />YES 17 <br />No-2 <br />YES - 20 <br />No-O <br />YEs-19 <br />No-O <br />YES 16 <br />No3 <br /> <br />OLD DILLON RESERVOIR <br /> <br />$100,000 <br /> <br />ROARING FORK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT <br /> <br />$40,000 <br /> <br />GRAND COUNTY STREAMFLOW MANAGEMENT PLAN <br />$100,000 <br /> <br />Fraser River Settling Pond: Grand County <br />$60,000 <br /> <br />Fraser River Settling Pond: Grand County <br />$127,900 <br /> <br />Reasons expressed for opposition <br /> <br />SB-179 <br />STATE <br />FUNDS <br /> <br /> <br />YES - 11 <br />No-2 <br /> <br />1) Old Dillon Reservoir - Cost of the Water. Believed that a non-structural <br />option of pursuing an agreement with Denver for use of a portion of Dillon <br />Reservoir would be preferable <br />2) Fraser Settling Ponds - One opponent believed that Denver Water should be a <br />financial part of the solution, one believed that Winter Park Ski Area should <br />pay, and one believed that as it didn't provide a new supply of water, it was <br />not appropriate. <br />3) There were 20 ballots cast, with some abstentions. The short vote on the State <br />Funds was believed to be a ballot interpretation problem. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.