Laserfiche WebLink
Well Augmentation Subdistrict - Loan Feasibility Study <br />Page 6 <br />WAS extends over the same broad area as the CCWCD but is geographically smaller in terms of the <br />number of acres included (Figure 1). The WAS boundaries specifically include only those lands <br />identified in individual contracts with constituents, i.e., the WAS boundaries are not contiguous. <br />WAS covers an aggregate geographic area totaling about 78 square miles. <br />Approximately 214 wells are currently members of the WAS plan for augmentation. WAS member <br />wells have groundwater right priority dates ranging from 1904 to 1966 and approximately 83 <br />percent of the WAS wells have priority dates senior to 1960 (Figure 2). Each WAS well owner has a <br />contract with WAS for augmentation water (Class B, C and D contracts) that currently total <br />approximately 20,400 ac -ft. WAS contracts provide supplemental ground water to some <br />constituents and are the sole water supply for other contract owners. Approximately 96 percent of <br />WAS contracts are for irrigation uses. <br />Figure 2: Water right priority dates associated with WAS constituent wells. <br />WAS operates the plan for augmentation decreed by the Water Court for Division 1 in Case No. <br />03CW099 (the "WAS Decree" or the "WAS Plan for Augmentation "). The WAS Plan is operated <br />using ten administrative reaches of the South Platte River (Figure 3). The river reaches extend <br />from the highest point of well depletion on the South Platte River near Denver to the lowest point of <br />well depletion near Fort Morgan. The depletions from pumping of each WAS well are assigned to <br />one of these reaches, and depletive effects are then aggregated by reach for replacement purposes. <br />The approximately 20,400 ac -ft of WAS contracts is distributed across reaches as shown in Figure <br />4. We note that Reaches F, C and A are subdivided into shorter subreaches as shown in Figure 3 <br />but the values shown in Figure 4 are total aggregated amounts for each administrative reach of the <br />WAS Plan. <br />On an annual basis WAS issues a "quota" to its constituent wells. The quota is a percentage of each <br />member's contracted augmentation supply amount, and is an allocation of overall WAS <br />augmentation supplies. As a result of very restrictive terms and conditions in its augmentation plan <br />1�VLeonardRice <br />ENGINEERS; W C. <br />WAS Constituents <br />Priorities of Groundwater Rights <br />1s <br />16 <br />a <br />14 <br />12 <br />I <br />6 <br />10 <br />a <br />8 i <br />3 <br />Z <br />6 <br />4 <br />p <br />- <br />le ti ti�i~� 10 <br />I-P 11:01 14+ 14 ", I" I-P 14P 14", 14P 1°�by 14P 1°j ^y 1°�� �°� �°� ti tie 1110 10 <br />Year of Appropriation <br />Figure 2: Water right priority dates associated with WAS constituent wells. <br />WAS operates the plan for augmentation decreed by the Water Court for Division 1 in Case No. <br />03CW099 (the "WAS Decree" or the "WAS Plan for Augmentation "). The WAS Plan is operated <br />using ten administrative reaches of the South Platte River (Figure 3). The river reaches extend <br />from the highest point of well depletion on the South Platte River near Denver to the lowest point of <br />well depletion near Fort Morgan. The depletions from pumping of each WAS well are assigned to <br />one of these reaches, and depletive effects are then aggregated by reach for replacement purposes. <br />The approximately 20,400 ac -ft of WAS contracts is distributed across reaches as shown in Figure <br />4. We note that Reaches F, C and A are subdivided into shorter subreaches as shown in Figure 3 <br />but the values shown in Figure 4 are total aggregated amounts for each administrative reach of the <br />WAS Plan. <br />On an annual basis WAS issues a "quota" to its constituent wells. The quota is a percentage of each <br />member's contracted augmentation supply amount, and is an allocation of overall WAS <br />augmentation supplies. As a result of very restrictive terms and conditions in its augmentation plan <br />1�VLeonardRice <br />ENGINEERS; W C. <br />