Laserfiche WebLink
Englewood, CO 80112 <br />(303) 225 -4611 <br />Attorney: Ms. Carolyn Burr, Esq. <br />Wellborn Sullivan Meck & Tooley, P.C. <br />1125 176' Street, Suite 2200 <br />Denver, CO 80202 <br />(303) 830 -2500 <br />8. List any feasibility studies or other investigations that have been completed or are now in progress <br />for the proposed project. If so, submit one copy of the study with this application. <br />August 2011: Mt. Pisgah Dam and Reservoir Outlet Inspection (see Appendix F) <br />November 2011: Alternatives Evaluation (summarized in Feasibility Study) <br />9. Estimated cost of the project. Please include estimated engineering costs, and estimated <br />construction costs, if known. <br />Estimated Engineering Costs: $78,714.50 <br />Estimated Construction Costs: $289,975.00 <br />Estimated Other Costs: $ 0 <br />Estimated Total Costs: $ $ 362,689.50 <br />10. Loan amount and terms you are requesting. <br />Requested Loan Amount: $ 161,345.00 <br />Term (length) of loan: 30 years <br />Interest Rate: 1.75% <br />Part C. - Project Sponsor Financial Information <br />Because the CWCB's Fund is a revolving fund, it is important that the project sponsor have the <br />financial capacity to repay any loans made by the CWCB. The following information is needed to <br />assist the CWCB in a preliminary assessment of the applicant's financial capacity. The project <br />sponsor will submit the three most recent annual financial statements. <br />1. List any existing long -term liability (multi -year) or indebtedness that exceeds one thousand <br />dollars. n/a <br />2. Are any of the above liabilities now in default, or been in default at any time in the past? YES <br />NO X_. If YES, please give detailed explanation. <br />3. Please provide a brief narrative description of sources of funding, in addition to the CWCB, which <br />have been explored for this project. <br />The Pisgah Ditch and Reservoir Company considered self - funding the project by raising assessments, <br />and came to the conclusion that this would not be feasible for shareholders. Other outside funding <br />options were not explored. <br />4 <br />