My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Upper Colorado River Stakeholder Group Conceptual Plan for a Wild and Secnic Management Alternative June 30 2009
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Upper Colorado River Stakeholder Group Conceptual Plan for a Wild and Secnic Management Alternative June 30 2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2012 2:38:04 PM
Creation date
10/5/2012 1:54:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Upper Colorado River Stakeholder Group Conceptual Plan for a Wild and Secnic Management Alternative June 30 2009
State
CO
Date
6/30/2008
Title
Upper Colorado River Stakeholder Group Conceptual Plan for a Wild and Secnic Management Alternative June 30 2009
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
June 30, 2008 <br />Table 2 (continued) <br />RECREATION FLOATBOATING <br />ISSUE <br />DESCRIPTION <br />EXAMPLE <br />Overuse of the <br />User levels could exceed a user capacity that is protective of the <br />This may be a concern for Segment 7, <br />Resource <br />ORVs. <br />where use is approaching the user <br />capacity identified by the USFS. <br />Competition /conflict <br />Special events such as races the Gore Festival that bring crowds may <br />The Gore festival and the National <br />amongst the <br />cause competition and conflict between different users sharing the <br />Whitewater Championships are held in <br />recreation users <br />same river access points. <br />Gore Canyon. <br />Commercial Use <br />The amount and type of permits /access (angling vs. whitewater) can <br />Conflicts may occur between angling, <br />affect ORVs'. Too much of one may impair the quality of <br />rafting and kayaking. <br />Whitewater <br />experience by another. <br />Recreation <br />Overuse by commercial may impairs the quality of experience by <br />private users. <br />RECREATION FISHING <br />ISSUE <br />DESCRIPTION <br />EXAMPLE <br />Aquatic nuisance <br />Aquatic nuisance species can harm the quality of the fishery and <br />Disease (Whirling, BHS, BKD), <br />species <br />angling experience. <br />invertebrates (New Zealand mud snail, <br />zebra mussels etc.) illegal fish <br />introductions, aquatic plants and algae. <br />Seasonal variability in <br />Without seasonal and annual variability in flows, habitat can be <br />Can impact habitat connectivity, <br />flows <br />diminished. <br />sediment movement, and temperature <br />Angling <br />The fishery can be impacted by over - fishing, handling mortality. <br />Overuse of the fishery by commercial <br />outfitters can degrade the fishery. <br />Whitewater <br />Whitewater recreation goals can conflict with the needs of fisheries. <br />Recreation <br />White Water Parks can change substrate and habitat. This can have <br />potential negative or positive affects on fish habitat and movement. <br />-29- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.