My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Upper Colorado River Stakeholder Group Conceptual Plan for a Wild and Secnic Management Alternative June 30 2009
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Upper Colorado River Stakeholder Group Conceptual Plan for a Wild and Secnic Management Alternative June 30 2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2012 2:38:04 PM
Creation date
10/5/2012 1:54:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Upper Colorado River Stakeholder Group Conceptual Plan for a Wild and Secnic Management Alternative June 30 2009
State
CO
Date
6/30/2008
Title
Upper Colorado River Stakeholder Group Conceptual Plan for a Wild and Secnic Management Alternative June 30 2009
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
June 30, 2008 <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />The Upper Colorado Wild and Scenic Stakeholder Group ( "Stakeholder Group" or "SG ") is <br />working together in good faith to develop a Management Plan Alternative that would protect the <br />outstandingly remarkable values ( "ORVs ") of Segments 4 through 7 of the Colorado River, as <br />identified in the 2007 Eligibility Report ( "2007 Eligibility Report") issued by the Bureau of Land <br />Management ( "BLM "). The Management Plan Alternative will be proposed to the BLM as a <br />potential Wild and Scenic Rivers management alternative in the BLM Resource Management <br />Plan revision process.2 The Stakeholder Group's intention is to develop a collaborative plan that <br />balances the following: permanent protection of the ORVs; certainty for the stakeholders; water <br />project yield; and flexibility for land owners, management agencies and water users. <br />This Conceptual Plan lays out a framework for development of the Management Plan <br />Alternative. The Conceptual Plan was developed cooperatively by a group of stakeholders and <br />consulting agencies representing a diverse range of interests. It lays out the group's progress to <br />date and intentions for additional data gathering, analysis and collaborative planning. The group <br />will continue to work together throughout 2008 and 2009 to gather adequate information to <br />develop more specific elements and details of the Management Plan Alternative. The goal of the <br />group is to furnish additional information to BLM as needed to satisfy NEPA requirements <br />supporting issuance of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ( "EIS "), and to complete the <br />detailed final Management Plan Alternative for submission to and consideration by BLM prior to <br />its issuance of a Final EIS and Record of Decision on the final plan. <br />The geographic scope of the Management Plan Alternative will encompass the Upper Colorado <br />River from the top of Gore Canyon, Colorado extending downstream to a point one mile east of <br />No Name Creek. This reach correlates with Colorado River Segments 4 through 7 as described in <br />BLM's 2007 Eligibility Report (See Appendix C; Figures C -1 through C -4). The Management <br />Plan Alternative will cover BLM lands within 1/4 mile of the river, and may also cover land <br />owned by or within the jurisdiction of state, local and private interests within the river corridor <br />with the consent of those landowners and other management agencies. In the development of the <br />Management Plan Alternative, the Stakeholder Group will consider impacts to areas outside of <br />these segments. <br />This Conceptual Plan focuses primarily on the flow -based ORVs of recreational floatboating and <br />recreational fishing, as identified in BLM's 2007 Eligibility Report. Flow protection is one of <br />the strongest features of the Wild & Scenic Rivers Act but, more importantly, it is the aspect that <br />state and local entities are most able to influence. Although the Stakeholder Group is focused <br />primarily on flow protection, the Management Plan Alternative will consider whether flow <br />protections recommended for recreational fishing and recreational floatboating are protective of <br />other ORVs, which may or may not be flow dependent. Where the recommended flows do not <br />protect the other ORVs, the Stakeholder Group will consider measures that would be <br />complementary to land management actions adopted by the BLM to protect the river's ORVs <br />and classification. The Management Plan Alternative will address all ORVs identified by the <br />z The Stakeholder Group makes no joint recommendation, at this time, on whether BLM should proceed with a <br />"suitability" determination, postpone such determination, or abandon it altogether. <br />-1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.