My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Upper Colorado River Stakeholder Group Conceptual Plan for a Wild and Secnic Management Alternative June 30 2009
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Upper Colorado River Stakeholder Group Conceptual Plan for a Wild and Secnic Management Alternative June 30 2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2012 2:38:04 PM
Creation date
10/5/2012 1:54:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Upper Colorado River Stakeholder Group Conceptual Plan for a Wild and Secnic Management Alternative June 30 2009
State
CO
Date
6/30/2008
Title
Upper Colorado River Stakeholder Group Conceptual Plan for a Wild and Secnic Management Alternative June 30 2009
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
June 30, 2008 <br />• Two - Dimensional Hydraulic Models (River2D). <br />• Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA). <br />Depending upon which model is selected, additional modeling may be required. If computer <br />modeling is needed, the participants will select one or more programs by July 15, 2008. Fish <br />surveys will be performed using the "mark and recapture" method. <br />2. Recreational f Floatboatina) <br />The BLM's Eligibility Study identifies Segments 4 through 7 as possessing recreational <br />(floatboating) ORVs. To ensure the recommended flows for Segments 4 through 7 do not <br />negatively impact the floatboating ORVs, the Stakeholder Group commits to collect data to <br />improve the knowledge base for these segments of the Colorado River. <br />Existing Information: <br />In the fall of 2007, American Whitewater conducted an online survey for the Upper Colorado <br />River basin to examine the flow needs for recreational boaters. These surveys offered <br />evidence about various flows necessary for kayaking and other recreational floatboating <br />opportunities. <br />The participants will review the Eagle County report and Grand County plan to examine <br />these analyses as they relate to the flows associated with recreational opportunities. The <br />studies were only recently released and need to be reviewed to determine whether they <br />satisfy the data needs for the Management Plan Alternative and whether data gaps remain. A <br />review of these plans will be conducted by June 30, 2008 to determine if additional data will <br />be collected. <br />There are a number of additional sources of information on recreational flow needs: <br />• BLM information. <br />• Guidebooks. <br />• Websites such as Eddyflower.com and Mountainbuzz.com. <br />• Existing data from private boater survey conducted by American Whitewater. <br />• Commercial rafting permit records. <br />• Data and analysis used for designing and constructing the Glenwood Springs <br />Whitewater Park. <br />• Arizona State University User Preference Survey for the Upper Colorado River. <br />Data Gaps: <br />Several data gaps need to be addressed: <br />• Commercial rafting is under - represented in the 2007 American Whitewater survey. <br />• Drift fishing is under- represented in existing data sources. There are several methods <br />to obtain this data, such as additional surveys and a professional assessment. <br />-16- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.