My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Memorandum: November 8 2009 Agenda Item 11 Water Supply Protection Section
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Memorandum: November 8 2009 Agenda Item 11 Water Supply Protection Section
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2012 2:35:12 PM
Creation date
10/5/2012 1:54:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Memorandum: November 8 2009 Agenda Item 11 Water Supply Protection Section
State
CO
Date
11/8/2009
Author
Kowalski, Ted; Bassi, Linda
Title
Memorandum: November 8 2009 Agenda Item 11 Water Supply Protection Section
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866 -3441 <br />Fax: (303) 866 -4474 <br />www.cwcb.state.co.us <br />TO: Colorado Water Conservation Board Members Bill Ritter' Jr. <br />Governor <br />FROM: Ted Kowalski and Linda Bassi James Martin <br />DNR Executive Director <br />DATE: November 8 2009 Jennifer Gimbel <br />� CWCB Di rector <br />SUBJECT: Agenda Item 11 November 17 -18 2009 Board Meeting Dan Mcauliffe <br />g` > > g CWCB Deputy Director <br />Water Supply Protection Section — Wild and Scenic <br />Rivers <br />Background <br />As we have discussed at a number of previous meetings, there are several different BLM and <br />USFS field offices that have initiated NEPA analysis through their planning processes, including <br />considering whether certain river segments are appropriately "suitable" for designation under the <br />Wild and Scenic River Act. With regard to these processes, the CWCB Staff have continued to <br />attend meetings with the various stakeholders, who include environmental interests, local <br />governments, recreational interests, federal agencies, state agencies, and water providers, to <br />explore a variety of alternatives for protecting the Outstandingly Remarkable Values ( "ORVs ") <br />associated with these river segments without affecting Colorado's ability to fully use its compact <br />entitlements. Stakeholder groups are currently discussing alternatives in the Dolores River basin <br />( "DRD group "), the San Juan River basin (separated into five different basins) ( "RPW group "), <br />the Upper Colorado River basin ( "the Upper Colorado group "), and the lower Gunnison, <br />Dolores, and Colorado River basins ( "the lower Colorado group "). <br />This past legislative session, the General Assembly enacted Senate Bill 09 -125, which created <br />the Wild and Scenic Rivers Fund ( "Fund ") and continuously appropriated $400,000 annually <br />from the CWCB's Construction Fund to develop protection of river - dependent resources as an <br />alternative to wild and scenic river designation. This Fund refreshes up to $400,000 each year; <br />however, the "Board shall review the purpose of the Fund annually and hereby is authorized to <br />cease providing moneys in the following year if, in its discretion, the Board determines that the <br />purposes for which the Fund was established has ceased. The Board may set terms and <br />conditions as it deems appropriate concerning the annual expenditures of moneys from the <br />Fund." At the September Board meeting, the Board requested the Staff to develop a draft of <br />terms and conditions for distributing monies from the Fund, which are attached. In addition, the <br />Board requested additional details about the four existing alternatives processes. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />The Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached terms and conditions for Fund <br />distribution. In addition, the Staff recommends that the Board provide feedback on the current <br />status of the various processes. <br />Water Supply Protection • Watershed Protection & Flood Mitigation • Stream & Lake Protection • Water Supply Planning & Finance <br />Water Conservation & Drought Planning • Intrastate Water Management & Development <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.