My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Arkansas Ground Water Rules Implemented in Horse Creek Basin: Colorado Stream Lines Newsletter
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Arkansas Ground Water Rules Implemented in Horse Creek Basin: Colorado Stream Lines Newsletter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2012 11:05:52 AM
Creation date
10/1/2012 10:58:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Arkansas Ground Water Rules Implemented in Horse Creek Basin: Colorado Stream Lines Newsletter
State
CO
Date
9/11/1997
Title
Arkansas Ground Water Rules Implemented in Horse Creek Basin: Colorado Stream Lines Newsletter
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Newsletter, Colorado Stream Lines <br />http://water.state.co.us/Article5.htm <br />Quarterly Newsletter of the Division of Water Resources <br />Look for the State Engineer's Annual Report on line at http:/ /Water.state.co.us /annirpt.htm. <br />A Look Back at the Amended Arkansas Rules <br />Excerpts from a speech by Steve Witte <br />Division Engineer, Water Division 2, to the Arkansas River Forum <br />Despite the risks inherent in the analogy, and given that I will never have any experience in real <br />childbirth because of my gender, the experience of implementing the Amended Rules Governing <br />the Diversion and Use of Tributary Ground Water was very much like childbirth.... <br />• It seemed as though "the time" would never come. <br />• The delivery was painful and messy. <br />• The parents were glad when it was over and not particularly looking forward to the next <br />time. <br />• Most everyone seems to agree that although the baby needs to do some growing ... it's not <br />all that bad looking. <br />A year ago at this time there was no certainty that "new rules" would become a reality. Following <br />the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in May 1995, which upheld Special Master Littleworth's <br />conclusion that post- Compact pumping in Colorado had caused material depletions to the usable <br />stateline flows of the Arkansas River Compact, Kansas filed a motion to enjoin well pumping in <br />excess of 15,000 a.f. per year. <br />In September of 1995, Colorado filed its amended use rules and the special master denied <br />Kansas' motion for injunction in which it was noted that "Colorado is now moving through its own <br />statutory and administrative procedures in order to develop pumping controls and procedures to <br />offset depletions." The basic premise of the amended rules was to require all high capacity, <br />tributary well owners to replace out -of- priority depletions to senior surface water rights in <br />accordance with an approved plan, or to discontinue pumping as of the effective date of the <br />rules. In addition, post- Compact irrigation wells in the valley fill and surficial aquifers along the <br />Arkansas River between Pueblo and the stateline must replace depletions to usable stateline <br />flow in accordance with an approved plan, or discontinue pumping beginning in 1996. <br />A number of parties filed pleadings in support of the proposed rules and six parties filed <br />objections. As a result of these objections, an eight -day trial before Judge Anderson took place <br />in April, 1996. On April 30, 1996, the judge issued his ruling fully upholding the amended rules <br />and setting the effective date of June 1, 1996. This allowed only a month for well owners to <br />1 of 3 09/11/97 12:33:58 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.