Laserfiche WebLink
DEC -14 -95 THU c-9:00 PUEBLO BOARD OF WATER WK P.01 <br />Colorado <br />water idea <br />ected <br />Kansas won't buy : . <br />t <br />V. ater- replacement <br />'13E C 13 1 95 <br />a s craft proposal <br />By JAMES AMOS ... ' . •uns�rvd® Water <br />The Puehlo Chic, ar,i Z ,., r ; $ti ®ri,d3aarc3 , <br />•LAMAR Kansas con Tues- , . ' )Yater ' ° <br />day rebuffed Colorado efforts to ; L116 bald Kansas' 'proposal lien- <br />orate a special water - replacement - • Contltued from Page lA' `' <br />long as Colorado wanted. ited the account to transmountain ' <br />account at John Marntt Reser- Kansas attorney, John Draper, water even though well -user <br />volt: ; <br />Water. officials discussed the : j said his state wanted the account groups are very unlikely to be able <br />to expire after'hne year. ,•, to buy transmountain water to re- <br />plan at a meeting of the Arkansas Colorado objected, saying it place what their wells use. ' <br />River Compact Administration couldn't gather. depletion data for Compact Chairman Larry Tru- <br />here: 1� 1 3 — � future. years and therefore needed jillo of Pueblo said the two sides <br />year la -time just to get the ac- would meet 'in late January to <br />a y g J • continue discussions. <br />count up and running. <br />R. elated story Then, Colorado voted against Both states did agree that a <br />! :? awn proposal for a spe- treasure allowing more recreation <br />on Page 3B Kansas <br />vial account. Montgomery said water to be stored at *.Trinidad <br />Colorado wouldn't approve a Reservoir should be approved: <br />Colorado water attorney Den - measure in which Kansas con. A final resolution for the pco- <br />rus Montgomery said water would trolled the account but wouldn't posal hadn't been finished Tues- <br />have. been stored at John Martin give Colorado credit for delivering day, so compact officials will <br />the water to Kansas. approve the measure at the Jahu- <br />Reservoir about '.,0 miles west of onion of Kansas ary meeting . <br />the border to ensure that Kansas Another p <br />receives the water it is entitled to measure troubled Colorado water The move would expand the <br />under the 19at Arkansas entitled to officials,'according to Chuck Lile, lakes recreation pool from 4,504 <br />Compact. executive director of the Colorado acre -feet to almost 16,000 acre - <br />Water Conservation Board. feet.'. <br />Colorado and Kansas are in the ' <br />midst of a decade -old lawsuit con- <br />cerning Arkansas River wilier. <br />Kansas has argued — and the ; <br />U.S. SupreMe Court has agreed <br />— that Colorado users of large- <br />capacity wells have taken water <br />that should have flowed into Kan- <br />sas via the Arkansas River. <br />Colorado's penalty for the de- <br />pletions has yet to be worked out. <br />The :proposed account would <br />have allowed Colorado large -well <br />users to store water at the dam <br />and release it to Kansas when <br />needed, Montgomery explained. <br />"Kansas could call for water <br />from this account at times when <br />' (the water) would be most useful ; <br />to Kansas;' he argued. <br />Any proposal that would <br />change the operation of John <br />Martin Reservoir or the interstate <br />compact would need agreement <br />from both states. " <br />Colorado originally wanted the <br />account to last as long as the <br />Compact Administration allowed. <br />ii..{ V nr• nn „iai MtA.� !•\I111A ��tl� <br />