My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Relations of Main-Stem Reservoir Operations and Specific Conductance in the Lower Arkansas River
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Relations of Main-Stem Reservoir Operations and Specific Conductance in the Lower Arkansas River
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2012 11:54:41 AM
Creation date
9/21/2012 11:35:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Relations of Main-Stem Reservoir Operations and Specific Conductance in the Lower Arkansas River
State
CO
Author
Lewis, Michael; Brendle, Daniel
Title
Relations of Main-Stem Reservoir Operations and Specific Conductance in the Lower Arkansas River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Relations of Streamf low and Specific- Conductance <br />Trends to Reservoir Operations in the Lower <br />Arkansas River, Southeastern Colorado <br />By Michael E. Lewis and Daniel L. Brendle <br />Abstract <br />To provide for the better management <br />of streamflow in the lower Arkansas River, <br />two main -stem reservoirs were constructed. <br />John Martin Reservoir, constructed near <br />Las Animas in 1948, and Pueblo Reservoir, <br />constructed near Pueblo in 1975, provide for <br />flood control, irrigation, municipal water supply, <br />and recreation. Both reservoirs have the potential <br />to alter specific conductance in the Arkansas <br />River because of streamflow management. A <br />change in specific conductance could affect the <br />intended use of the water as an agricultural or <br />domestic water supply. Step -trend analysis of <br />streamflow and specific- conductance data for <br />the Arkansas River was used for determining if <br />the operation of Pueblo Reservoir or John Martin <br />Reservoir had affected streamflow or specific <br />conductance in the lower Arkansas River. The <br />nonparametric Mann - Whitney - Wilcoxon rank - <br />sum test was used for trend analysis. <br />Streamflow and specific- conductance data <br />collected at five streamflow- gaging stations on <br />the lower Arkansas River and at one station on <br />the upper Arkansas River were analyzed for <br />trends. The station in the upper basin was <br />included in the analysis to differentiate between <br />trends in the lower basin that were caused by <br />differences in the quantity or quality of inflow <br />from the upper basin or were caused by reservoir <br />operations in the lower basin. Data from the <br />station in the upper basin and from the three <br />stations located between Pueblo Reservoir and <br />John Martin Reservoir were analyzed for trends <br />that may have occurred after 1974, which corre- <br />sponds to the construction of Pueblo Reservoir. <br />Data from the two stations located downstream <br />from John Martin Reservoir were analyzed for <br />trends that may have occurred after the imple- <br />mentation of a new reservoir operating plan in <br />1980. <br />At the station in the upper basin, stream- <br />flow increased significantly and specific conduc- <br />tance decreased significantly after 1974 during <br />the low -flow months, January, February, and <br />March. These trends apparently were caused <br />by the increased importation of low- specific- <br />conductance water after 1974 from the Colorado <br />River Basin into the Arkansas River. At the three <br />stations located between Pueblo Reservoir and <br />John Martin Reservoir, streamflow and specific <br />conductance primarily were affected by Pueblo <br />Reservoir operations. After 1974, at the two <br />stations located 0.4 and 24 miles downstream <br />from Pueblo Reservoir, streamflow generally <br />increased during most months of the growing <br />season and decreased during November through <br />February. The streamflow trends at these two <br />stations largely were attributed to the storage of <br />water in Pueblo Reservoir during winter and to <br />the release of that stored water during the growing <br />season in order to meet downstream irrigation <br />needs. At the station 0.4 mi downstream from <br />Pueblo Reservoir, specific conductance decreased <br />during most months between September and <br />Abstract 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.