My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Relations of Main-Stem Reservoir Operations and Specific Conductance in the Lower Arkansas River
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Relations of Main-Stem Reservoir Operations and Specific Conductance in the Lower Arkansas River
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2012 11:54:41 AM
Creation date
9/21/2012 11:35:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Relations of Main-Stem Reservoir Operations and Specific Conductance in the Lower Arkansas River
State
CO
Author
Lewis, Michael; Brendle, Daniel
Title
Relations of Main-Stem Reservoir Operations and Specific Conductance in the Lower Arkansas River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
May and peaks in the middle or latter part of June. <br />The recession of snowmelt runoff usually is supple- <br />mented by off - channel reservoir releases in the upper <br />basin in July and August. Natural base flow and <br />reservoir releases maintain streamflow during the <br />low -flow period from October through March. At <br />station 07099400 (Arkansas River above Pueblo), <br />located 0.4 mi downstream from Pueblo Dam, stream- <br />flow is regulated by the operation of Pueblo Reservoir. <br />The hydrograph for station 07099400 is similar to the <br />hydrograph for station 07096000, except that stream- <br />flow is considerably smaller at station 07099400 <br />during November through March. At station 07109500 <br />(Arkansas River near Avondale), located about 24 mi <br />downstream from Pueblo Reservoir, streamflow is <br />affected by Pueblo Reservoir operations and by <br />substantial tributary inflow from Fountain Creek and <br />the St. Charles River. The shape of the hydrograph <br />for station 07109500 is similar to the hydrograph for <br />station 07099400, except that tributary inflow from <br />occasional rainfall runoff produces distinctly larger <br />peaks, and the streamflow is substantially larger at <br />station 07109500 during winter, owing to tributary <br />inflow from Fountain Creek. At station 07124000 <br />(Arkansas River at Las Animas), which is located <br />110 mi downstream from Pueblo Reservoir, the magni- <br />tude of streamflow is substantially smaller than at the <br />upstream stations. The decrease in streamflow is attrib- <br />utable to irrigation diversions. As previously discussed <br />in the "Description of Study Area" section, much of <br />the streamflow in the river downstream from La Junta <br />(fig. 1) consists of irrigation- return flow during parts of <br />most years. Downstream from John Martin Reservoir at <br />stations 07130500 (Arkansas River below John Martin <br />Reservoir) and 07133000 (Arkansas River at Lamar), <br />the annual hydrographs are regulated by the storage <br />and release operations in John Martin Reservoir. The <br />reservoir gates typically are closed during November <br />through March, and all inflow is stored; winter stream- <br />flow at stations 07130500 and 07133000 is main- <br />tained by ground -water discharge. Requests for reser- <br />voir releases of stored water by downstream irrigators <br />usually begin in the first 2 weeks of April and continue <br />episodically through October. Rainfall runoff that <br />is generated upstream from the reservoir is attenuated <br />by storage in the reservoir. Streamflow between <br />John Martin Reservoir and Lamar is substantially <br />decreased by irrigation diversions. <br />Specific conductance in the Arkansas River <br />markedly increases downstream from Pueblo (fig. 4). <br />The downstream increase in specific conductance <br />is a function of the evaporative concentration of <br />dissolved solids. In 1990 -93, during a period of inten- <br />sive data collection, the median specific conductance <br />increased downstream from 276 µS /cm at Canon <br />City to 3,855 µS /cm at Lamar (fig. 4). Miles (1977) <br />reported that the dissolution of soluble sedimentary <br />materials between Canon City and Pueblo Reservoir <br />increases specific conductance in that reach. From <br />Pueblo to Lamar, specific conductance primarily <br />increases because of the consumptive use of irrigation <br />water and the concomitant increase in the concentra- <br />tion of dissolved solids. The rate of increase in specific <br />conductance is larger downstream from Catlin Dam <br />(fig. 4) because irrigation -return flow composes a <br />larger percentage of streamflow in this reach than it <br />does upstream from Catlin Dam (Cain, 1987). <br />RELATIONS OF STREAMFLOW AND <br />SPECIFIC - CONDUCTANCE TRENDS <br />TO RESERVOIR OPERATIONS IN <br />THE ARKANSAS RIVER <br />At Canon City <br />Station 07096000 (Arkansas River at Canon <br />City) is located in the upper Arkansas River Basin <br />about 28 mi upstream from Pueblo Reservoir (fig. 1). <br />Streamflow and specific- conductance trends were <br />analyzed at this site to determine if the quantity and <br />quality of water flowing from the upper basin into the <br />lower basin were different during the period before the <br />completion of Pueblo Reservoir (pre -1975) compared <br />to the period after the completion of Pueblo Reservoir <br />(post- 1974). Streamflow and specific- conductance <br />data were available for 1964 -94. Streamflow and <br />specific - conductance data from 1964 through 1974 <br />were compared to data from 1975 through 1994. <br />The median annual streamflow at station <br />07096000 increased from about 520,800 acre -ft/yr <br />in 1964 -74 to about 538,600 acre - ft/yr in 1975 -94; <br />however, this difference in streamflow was not statisti- <br />cally significant (p= 0.92). Although there was no <br />significant change in the median annual streamflow, <br />the daily mean streamflow changed substantially in <br />several months of the two periods (fig. 5). Daily mean <br />streamflow increased significantly (p< -0.05) between <br />1964 -74 and 1975 -94 in January, February, March, <br />April, June, October, November, and December <br />(table 2). Most of the increases occurred during low <br />RELATIONS OF STREAMFLOW AND SPECIFIC - CONDUCTANCE TRENDS TO RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 11 <br />IN THE ARKANSAS RIVER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.