My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Relations of Main-Stem Reservoir Operations and Specific Conductance in the Lower Arkansas River
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Relations of Main-Stem Reservoir Operations and Specific Conductance in the Lower Arkansas River
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2012 11:54:41 AM
Creation date
9/21/2012 11:35:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Relations of Main-Stem Reservoir Operations and Specific Conductance in the Lower Arkansas River
State
CO
Author
Lewis, Michael; Brendle, Daniel
Title
Relations of Main-Stem Reservoir Operations and Specific Conductance in the Lower Arkansas River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The operation of Pueblo Reservoir, in particular <br />the Winter Water Storage Program (WWSP), has a <br />notable effect on the historic streamflow regime of the <br />lower Arkansas River. In winter (November— March), <br />prior to the implementation of the WWSP in 1975, <br />irrigators in the lower Arkansas River Valley gener- <br />ally diverted appropriated Arkansas River water onto <br />fallow fields to increase soil moisture for later use by <br />crops during the growing season. Alternatively, this <br />water could have been stored during the winter and <br />then released to the river for the downstream irrigators <br />to use during times when streamflow was insufficient <br />to meet irrigation needs. However, under Colorado <br />water law, storage of water that is diverted with direct - <br />flow water rights is not permitted. Therefore, the <br />WWSP was created to allow several irrigation canal <br />companies downstream from Pueblo Reservoir to <br />store their direct -flow water in Pueblo Reservoir, <br />John Martin Reservoir, and in several private off - <br />channel reservoirs during the winter and to use this <br />water during the crop- growing season. Under the <br />WWSP, winter water storage is allowed from <br />November 15 to March 15. Generally, WWSP water is <br />released from storage at times when streamflow is not <br />large enough to meet irrigation demands. This situa- <br />tion usually occurs in early spring or late summer and <br />autumn. Winter water was stored every year from <br />1975 to 1994, except during the 1977 -78 winter - <br />storage season. During 1975 -94, the median annual <br />volume of water that was stored in Pueblo Reservoir <br />as part of the WWSP was about 42,200 acre -ft <br />(Colorado Division of Water Resources, written <br />commun., 1995). <br />John Martin Reservoir <br />John Martin Reservoir is a 608,200- acre -ft <br />main -stem reservoir located 58 mi upstream from the <br />Colorado- Kansas State line (fig. 1). The reservoir is <br />used for flood control, irrigation -water storage, and <br />recreation. Storage of irrigation water in John Martin <br />Reservoir is by agreement between the States of <br />Colorado and Kansas, under the terms of the Arkansas <br />River Compact. The Arkansas River Compact is an <br />agreement between Colorado and Kansas, signed in <br />1948, which ensures both States will receive their <br />percentage share of Arkansas River flows. The <br />Compact agreement dictated a winter- and a summer- <br />storage period. During the winter - storage period from <br />November 1 to March 31, all inflow to the reservoir <br />was required to be stored, except that as much as <br />100 ft3 /s of water could be requested by Colorado <br />water users downstream from the dam (Abbott, 1985). <br />During the remainder of the year, river flow was <br />stored, although Colorado could demand the <br />release of as much as 500 ft3 /s of the water entering <br />the reservoir and Kansas could demand releases of that <br />part of the inflow between 500 and 750 ft3 /s. Provi- <br />sions were made for the rate of release of stored water, <br />without reference to the volume of stored water <br />assigned to each State. To ensure that each State <br />received its share of stored water, release demands had <br />to be made concurrently. Although the Arkansas River <br />Compact was developed to ensure that Colorado and <br />Kansas irrigators received their legal shares of <br />Arkansas River water, the plan had several problems <br />and generally was unsatisfactory to both States <br />(Abbott, 1985). Historically, following the winter - <br />storage period, reservoir storage was usually drawn <br />down to empty or almost empty very early in the irri- <br />gation season, often by the middle of April. Because <br />of the unsatisfactory nature of this operation, a resolu- <br />tion was adopted by the Arkansas River Compact <br />Administration in 1980. This resolution commonly is <br />referred to as the 1980 operating plan (Arkansas River <br />Compact Administration, 1980). Under the new plan, <br />any water not immediately called for and released to <br />downstream irrigators is stored in separate storage <br />accounts for the States of Colorado and Kansas. Either <br />State can call for the release of its stored water inde- <br />pendently of the other. Two other recent changes have <br />been made in the operation of John Martin Reservoir <br />that affect reservoir storage and streamflow down- <br />stream from John Martin Reservoir. A 10,000- acre -ft <br />permanent recreation pool was established in 1976, <br />and three irrigation canal companies have been <br />allowed to store their approved WWSP water in <br />John Martin Reservoir. Thirty -five percent of the <br />winter water that the three canal companies store in <br />John Martin Reservoir is shifted to Arkansas River <br />Compact use and is subject to downstream release. <br />These two changes, in conjunction with the 1980 oper- <br />ating plan, have substantially increased the long -term <br />storage of water in John Martin Reservoir and have <br />altered the flow regime in the Arkansas River down- <br />stream from the reservoir. <br />WATER ADMINISTRATION AND RESERVOIR OPERATIONS 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.