Laserfiche WebLink
3,500 <br />3,000 <br />OZ <br />�j O 2,500 <br />� W <br />aU) Ec <br />CE <br />EL <br />LLI 2,000 <br />Q W <br />W W <br />LL 1,500 <br />U <br />J CO <br />U <br />ZO Z 1,000 <br />500 <br />JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC <br />1987 <br />EXPLANATION <br />--F- STREAMFLOW -0 - SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE <br />Figure 4. Relation of streamflow to specific <br />conductance for the Arkansas River <br />near Avondale, 1987. <br />Las Animas. Data collected at each site <br />were separated into two seasons: growing <br />season (March 16— November 14) and <br />winter- storage season (November 15— <br />March 15). Data collected prior to 1975 <br />were compared to data collected from <br />1975 through 1994. At individual stations, <br />the record for specific- conductance data <br />generally was shorter than the record for <br />streamflow. Therefore, the streamflow <br />record for individual stations was shortened <br />to match the specific- conductance record <br />for that station. This matching of records <br />facilitated the direct comparison of stream- <br />flow and specific- conductance trends at <br />individual stations. <br />Arkansas River <br />Above Pueblo <br />After construction of Pueblo <br />Reservoir, streamflow in the Arkansas <br />River upstream from Pueblo increased <br />during the growing season and decreased <br />during the winter - storage season, largely <br />due to the effects of the WWSP. Because <br />specific conductance tends to be inversely <br />proportional to streamflow, specific con- <br />ductance at this site would be expected to <br />increase during the winter - storage season <br />and decrease during the growing season. <br />The opposite occurred. The median specific <br />conductance increased slightly from 460 to <br />465 g6/cm between 1966 -74 and 1975 -94 <br />during the growing season and decreased <br />substantially from 720 to 575 g6/ern during <br />the winter- storage season (fig. 5). <br />H <br />1,100 <br />1,000 U <br />Z W <br />U W <br />goo D 2 <br />n P <br />O W J <br />UUW <br />800 U cc U <br />CL W <br />U <br />az¢ <br />700 U � W <br />Z W 0 <br />W <br />�O N � <br />600 } U Q <br />J — <br />_� <br />F <br />z? <br />500 O <br />400 <br />The changes in specific conduc- <br />tance after construction of Pueblo <br />Reservoir are not a direct function of <br />changes in streamflow, but are more <br />directly related to the storage and subse- <br />quent mixing of seasonally low- specific- <br />conductance water and seasonally high - <br />specific- conductance water in Pueblo <br />Reservoir. Low- specific- conductance <br />water generally flowed into the reservoir <br />during May— August and mixed with high - <br />specific- conductance water that flowed <br />into the reservoir during the fall, winter, <br />and spring. The result was a narrowing <br />of the range in specific- conductance <br />values after 1974. <br />Arkansas River <br />Near Avondale <br />After construction of Pueblo <br />Reservoir, streamflow near Avondale <br />increased during the growing season <br />and decreased during the winter - storage <br />season. The decreased winter streamflow <br />was caused by storage of WWSP water in <br />Pueblo Reservoir. The increase in stream- <br />flow during the growing season partly is <br />attributable to the release of WWSP water <br />from Pueblo Reservoir. Increased inflow <br />from Fountain Creek (fig. 1) also accounts <br />for some of the increased streamflow. <br />Population growth in the Colorado Springs <br />area and the associated increase in unit <br />runoff and wastewater discharge are <br />partly responsible for the increase in the <br />median annual streamflow of Fountain <br />Creek at Pueblo, which increased <br />from about 37,000 acre -ft per year in <br />1969 -74 to about 67,000 acre -ft per <br />year in 1975 -94. <br />Specific conductance near Avondale <br />changed appreciably after 1974 (fig. 6), <br />but the changes were different from the <br />changes observed at the site upstream <br />from Pueblo (fig. 5). Between 1969 -74 and <br />1975 -94, the median specific conductance <br />increased from 580 to 700 g6/cm during <br />the growing season and increased from 900 <br />to 1,060 gS /cm during the winter - storage <br />season (fig 6). <br />The combined effect of reservoir <br />operations, as observed at the site upstream <br />from Pueblo, and an increase in the inflow <br />of dissolved solids from Fountain Creek <br />apparently caused the changes in specific <br />conductance near Avondale. Although <br />specific conductance in Fountain Creek <br />decreased after 1974, it remained sub- <br />stantially higher than in the Arkansas <br />River near Avondale. The increase in <br />800 <br />cc <br />WF <br />U <br />z W <br />la- W 700 <br />1966 -74 <br />UZ- <br />® 1975 -94 <br />�UW <br />z�U <br />oC/) W 600 <br />u z� <br />W2W <br />aW0 <br />Fn N <br />zQ cc F <br />500 <br />a <br />DU <br />W g <br />�z <br />400 <br />GROWING <br />WINTER <br />- <br />SEASON <br />STORAGE <br />SEASON <br />Figure 5. Specific conductance for the <br />Arkansas River above Pueblo, 1966 -94. <br />