My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Stream: Animas River (Lower Segement) Executive Summary
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Stream: Animas River (Lower Segement) Executive Summary
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2012 2:08:00 PM
Creation date
9/5/2012 2:01:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Stream: Animas River (Lower Segement) Executive Summary
State
CO
Water Division
7
Title
Stream: Animas River (Lower Segement) Executive Summary
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Biological Data <br />This segment of the Animas River is a moderate gradient stream with moderate to large substrate <br />size, often punctuated by large boulders within the stream channel. Many portions of the stream <br />channel have been affected by historic mining that moved bedload materials. Natural hydrologic <br />processes since the mining activity ceased have created a natural stream channel, but some <br />portions of the river are still highly braided and lack good width to depth ratios. <br />Water quality in the stream segment is affected by heavy metals from both natural sources and <br />historic mining activities within the watershed. Minnie Gulch, Maggie Gulch and Cunningham <br />Creek contribute water to the river that has lower concentrations of heavy metals, so water <br />quality improves as you move downstream through the reach. <br />Fish surveys have documented naturally reproducing populations of brook trout in this reach. <br />Brook trout are the trout species that are most tolerant of heavy metal loads, but they indicate <br />that the stream has sufficient macroinvertebrates to provide for fish forage, and that the stream <br />has basic ecologic functions. Brook trout are not found below this reach, indicating that <br />downstream heavy metal loads are once again too high for fish habitat. <br />The riparian community consists primarily of willows and potentilla. The riparian community in <br />this reach is vigorous and has succeeded in converting the stream from a braided system to a <br />channelized environment that is more favorable to fish populations. <br />Field Survey Data <br />BLM staff used the R2Cross methodology to quantify the amount of water required to preserve <br />the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2Cross method requires that stream <br />discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. Riffles are most <br />easily visualized, as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow cease. <br />This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, surveying the stream <br />channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2Cross data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br />For this segment of stream, five data sets were collected with the results shown in Table 1 below. <br />Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning's Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based <br />on meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.