My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Stream: Cochetopa Creek (Lower Segement) Executive Summary
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Stream: Cochetopa Creek (Lower Segement) Executive Summary
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2012 2:12:43 PM
Creation date
9/5/2012 2:00:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Stream: Cochetopa Creek (Lower Segement) Executive Summary
State
CO
Water Division
4
Title
Stream: Cochetopa Creek (Lower Segement) Executive Summary
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
described through the following description of the steps used to complete the evaluation for this <br />particular stream. <br />The first step required in determining water availability is a determination of the hydrologic <br />regime at the Lower Terminus (LT) of the recommended ISF reach. In the best case this means <br />looking at the data from a gage at the LT. Further, this data, in the best case, has been collected <br />for a long period of time (the longer the better) including wet and dry periods. In the case of <br />Cochetopa Creek — Lower there is a USGS gage record of discharge on the stream. However, <br />the gage station is upstream from the LT. The USGS gage is COCHETOPA CREEK BELOW <br />ROCK CREEK NR PARLIN, CO. (USGS 09118450); it has a period of record (POR) of 28 <br />years collected between 1981 and 2009. The gage is at an elevation of 8,470 ft above mean sea <br />level (amsl) and has a drainage area of 334 mil. The hydrograph (plot of discharge over time) <br />produced from this gage includes the consumptive uses and out -of -basin transfers of several <br />diversions. However, the existence of these diversions does not preclude use of the data from the <br />gage. To make the measured data transferable to Cochetopa Creek — Lower above the LT, the <br />consumptive portions of these diversions were added back to the measured hydrograph. The <br />resulting "adjusted" hydrograph could then be used on Cochetopa Creek — Lower above the LT <br />by multiplying the "adjusted" gage discharge values by an area ratio; specifically, the area of <br />Cochetopa Creek — Lower above the LT (373.48 mi) to Cochetopa Creek near Parlin, CO (334 <br />mi2). The resulting proportioned hydrograph was itself "adjusted" (decreased) to reflect the <br />consumptive irrigation depletions and out -of -basin diversions upstream of the LT. The final <br />hydrograph thus represents a distribution of flow over time that has been reduced to reflect <br />existing human uses. <br />{The Following discussion is based upon the US Geological Survey's Techniques of Water - <br />Resources Investigations Series, Book 4: Hydrologic Analysis and Interpretation, Chapter A3: <br />Statistical Methods in Water Resources (Chapter 3: Describing Uncertainty) by D.R. Helsel and <br />R. M. Hirsch. This technical reference provides the scientific background and guidance <br />important to the systematic interpretation of hydrologic data. The document is available online <br />and is a valuable aid to understanding and interpreting the analyses described here.) <br />The next step in producing a representation of the discharge at Cochetopa Creek — Lower is to <br />compute the Geometric Mean of the area- prorated "adjusted" data values from the Cochetopa <br />Creek near Parlin, CO hydrograph. This step is of value because of the inherent statistical <br />weaknesses found in any collection of data intended to measure natural stream discharge. <br />Without getting into the details of statistical theory, it is worth noting that a set of discharge <br />measurements is inherently inaccurate, no matter how well collected, due to the difficulties <br />attendant to data collection, especially hydrologic data. To give deference to this fact and to <br />increase the value of the hydrograph product of this analysis, the Geometric Means of the data <br />were _computed and plotted along with the 95% Confidence Intervals about the data. The <br />resultant hydrograph, including recommended Instream Flow values, is displayed in figure 1 <br />with the data displayed in Table 1. <br />-5- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.