Laserfiche WebLink
measurements indicate flows that are approximately double the current instream flow water <br />right. <br />Instream Flow Recommendation <br />The BLM recommended an increase of 4.5 cfs (April 1 to July 31), based on its data collection <br />efforts. The modeling results from this survey effort are within the confidence interval produced <br />by the R2Cross model. <br />Land Status Review <br />Upper Terminus <br />Lower Terminus <br />Total Length <br />(miles) <br />Land Ownership <br />% Private <br />% Public <br />Confl. w/ Big Blue Creek <br />& Little Blue Creek <br />Confl. w/ Morrow <br />Point Reservoir <br />3.53 <br />0% <br />100% <br />64% of the public lands are managed by the National Park Service and the remaining 36% are <br />managed by the BLM. <br />Biological Data <br />This segment of Blue Creek is a moderate to high gradient stream, with moderate to large <br />substrate size, punctuated by large boulders. The proposed reach is confined by a narrow <br />canyon, and some portions of the creek are further confined by the construction and maintenance <br />of U.S. Highway 50. The riparian community is in good condition and composed of willow, <br />alder, and spruce. The creek provides a good mix of pools, riffles, and runs for fish habitat. The <br />riparian community often provides good shading for the water column. Fishery surveys indicate <br />that the creek supports a self - sustaining population of brook trout, rainbow trout, and speckled <br />dace. <br />Field Survey Data <br />BLM staff used the R2Cross methodology to quantify the amount of water required to preserve <br />the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2Cross method requires that stream <br />discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. Riffles are most <br />easily visualized, as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow cease. <br />This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, surveying the stream <br />channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2Cross data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br />-3- <br />