Laserfiche WebLink
Biological Data <br />Alpine Gulch is a high gradient stream with step -pool geomorphology and large substrate size. <br />The aquatic environment in Alpine Gulch is limited by heavy metals (aluminum) deposited into <br />the creek from natural sources and from historic mining activity. However, the creek is capable <br />of supporting brook trout and brown trout, as evidenced by BLM fishery surveys. It is unclear <br />whether the fish are reproducing in Alpine Gulch, or whether the fish reproduce in Henson Creek <br />and then utilize Alpine Gulch for cover and forage purposes. Mayfly have been consistently <br />observed within the creek, and this is likely the trout food source. <br />Field Survey Data <br />BLM staff used the R2Cross methodology to quantify the amount of water required to preserve <br />the natural environment to a reasonable degree. The R2Cross method requires that stream <br />discharge and channel profile data be collected in a riffle stream habitat type. Riffles are most <br />easily visualized, as the stream habitat types that would dry up first should streamflow cease. <br />This type of hydraulic data collection consists of setting up a transect, surveying the stream <br />channel geometry, and measuring the stream discharge. <br />Biological Flow Recommendation <br />The CWCB staff relied upon the biological expertise of the cooperating agencies to interpret <br />output from the R2Cross data collected to develop the initial, biologic instream flow <br />recommendation. This initial recommendation is designed to address ' the unique biologic <br />requirements of each stream without regard to water availability. Three instream flow hydraulic <br />parameters, average depth, percent wetted perimeter, and average velocity are used to develop <br />biologic instream flow recommendations. The CDOW has determined that maintaining these <br />three hydraulic parameters at adequate levels across riffle habitat types, aquatic habitat in pools <br />and runs will also be maintained for most life stages of fish and aquatic invertebrates (Nehring <br />1979; Espegren 1996). <br />For this segment of stream, two data sets were collected with the results shown in Table 1 below. <br />Table 1 shows who collected the data (Party), the date the data was collected (Date), the <br />measured discharge at the time of the survey (Q), the accuracy range of the predicted flows <br />based on Manning's Equation (240% and 40% of Q), the summer flow recommendation based <br />on meeting 3 of 3 hydraulic criteria and the winter flow recommendation based upon 2 of 3 <br />hydraulic criteria. It is believed that recommendations that fall outside of the accuracy range of <br />the model, over 250% of the measured discharge or under 40% of the measured discharge may <br />not give an accurate estimate of the necessary instream flow required. <br />Table 1: Data <br />Party <br />Date <br />Q <br />250 % -40% <br />Summer 3/3 <br />Winter 2/3 <br />BLM <br />10/09/2009 <br />2.38 <br />6.0-1.0 <br />4.98 <br />1.10 <br />BLM <br />10/09/2009 <br />2.54 <br />6.3-1.0 <br />Out of Range <br />1.06 <br />The summer flow recommendation, which meets 3 of 3 criteria and is within the accuracy range <br />of the R2CROSS model, is 5.0 cfs. The winter flow recommendation, which meets 2 of 3 <br />criteria and is within the accuracy range of the R2CROSS model is 1.0 cfs. <br />-3- <br />