Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCTION ` <br />In December of 1992, Legislative Council staff (LCS) surveyed Colorado's ' <br />twenty executive departments, the Office of the Governor, and the Judicial branch, <br />asking each department to identify the federal and state mandates it administers or <br />monitors. In response to the survey, the departments provided the following- <br />information: <br />— the source of each mandate (federal or state); <br />— the nature of the mandate (programmatic or procedural); <br />— the type of mandate (direct order, condition of aid, or optional activity <br />with regulations); and <br />— the fiscal impact of the mandate for fiscal year (FY) 1991 -92 and FY <br />1992 -93, and the estimated impact for FY 1993 -94. <br />An Inventory of Federal and State Mandates in Colorado presents survey <br />responses by state department. Federal mandates which affect multiple state <br />departments have been compiled into a separate section at the back of the inventory. <br />Definitions of the terminology and the study methodology and limitations follow. <br />Definitions <br />Mandate - A mandate is any legal requirement established by constitutional <br />provision, statutory provision„ or administrative regulation through which a <br />higher unit of government requires a subordinate unit of government to provide <br />a speck activity or service which meets minimum standards. <br />Nature of Mandate ■ <br />Programmatic - Programmatic mandates specify the conduct, quality, or scope <br />of a program. <br />Procedural - Procedural mandates direct subordinate governments to perform <br />specific duties such as reporting, accounting, or other managerial activities. <br />Tvne of Mandate <br />■ <br />Direct Order - Direct order mandates require compliance by subordinate <br />governments, regardless of funding. Direct orders may carry sanctions or <br />ii <br />