My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Decision Delayed on Lake Pueblo Charges: Pueblo Chieftain
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Decision Delayed on Lake Pueblo Charges: Pueblo Chieftain
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2012 3:07:03 PM
Creation date
8/20/2012 2:16:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Decision Delayed on Lake Pueblo Charges: Pueblo Chieftain
State
CO
Date
4/4/2001
Author
Amos, James
Title
Decision Delayed on Lake Pueblo Charges: Pueblo Chieftain
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Pueblo Chieftain Online - Wednesday April 04, 2001 <br />SERVICES: <br />Contact Us <br />Subscribe <br />Advertising <br />General Advertising Rate <br />Card <br />Web Development <br />About this site <br />Career Opportunities <br />EVENTS <br />ACTIVITIES: <br />State Fair <br />Active Years <br />Summerfest <br />W interfest <br />Guidebook <br />Spring Runoff 2001 <br />Pueblo Zoo <br />FOCUS ON YOUTH: <br />Headbone Zone <br />Classroom Chieftain <br />School District 60 <br />School District 70 <br />Pueblo Library District <br />wysiwyg: //81 /http: / /www. chieftain. com/wednesday /news /index /article /5 <br />The big cities already have agreed to pay a 15 <br />percent surcharge on their own shares of the <br />enlarged space to help pay for the water <br />management space. But those surcharges will <br />only pay for about 7,500 acre -feet of water <br />management, which is hardly more than the 5,000 <br />acre -feet already guaranteed to hold winter <br />farming water. <br />The district's committee charged with planning <br />the enlargement project couldn't come to an <br />agreement on how the rest of the water <br />management space should be funded and so <br />district staff suggested setting the question aside <br />for a time. <br />District staff have suggested two ways to pay for <br />the water management space, which will be <br />studied in the coming months. <br />One idea would require users of the water <br />management space and groups that buy water <br />from the district to pay fees to reimburse the <br />district for the space. <br />The other idea involves extending the district's <br />nine- county property tax for five or six years after <br />most of it expires around 2027. <br />District financial chief Phil Reynolds explained <br />that the district will have repaid the federal <br />government for the Fryingpan - Arkansas project <br />by 2027 and that the .822 mill property tax would <br />drop to a lower level to continue funding the <br />district's overhead. <br />The property tax now costs the owner of a <br />$100,000 house $8.22 a year. It generated about <br />$4 million last year, most of which the district <br />gives to the federal government to repay the <br />project's debt. <br />Extending the tax would require a vote of all <br />residents in the conservancy district, which <br />stretches along the Arkansas River roughly from <br />Buena Vista to Lamar and includes Colorado <br />Springs and Fountain Creek. <br />Small- community representatives earlier argued <br />r . V# <br />R -Bed & Breai host <br />2 of 4 4/4/014:15 PM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.