My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Comparison of Two Approaces for Determining Ground-Water Discharge and Pumpage in the Lower Arkansas River Basin Colorado 1997-98
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Comparison of Two Approaces for Determining Ground-Water Discharge and Pumpage in the Lower Arkansas River Basin Colorado 1997-98
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2012 3:06:18 PM
Creation date
8/20/2012 1:52:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Comparison of Two Approaces for Determining Ground-Water Discharge and Pumpage in the Lower Arkansas River Basin Colorado 1997-98
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Author
Dash, Russell; Troutman, Brent; Edelmann, Patrick
Title
Comparison of Two Approaces for Determining Ground-Water Discharge and Pumpage in the Lower Arkansas River Basin Colorado 1997-98
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CONTENTS <br />ExecutiveSummary ................................................................................................................................ <br />............................... <br />1 <br />5 <br />Introduction............................................................................................................................................. <br />............................... <br />5 <br />Purposeand Scope ........................................................................................................................ <br />............................... <br />6 <br />Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................ <br />............................... <br />6 <br />Methodsof Investigation ........................................................................................................................ <br />............................... <br />7 <br />Totalizing Flowmeter Measurements ............................................................................................ <br />............................... <br />8 <br />Portable Flowmeter Measurements .............................................................................................. <br />............................... <br />9 <br />Power Conversion Calculations and Computations of Pumpage .................................................. <br />............................... <br />23 <br />QualityControl of Data ................................................................................................................ <br />............................... <br />10 <br />10 <br />Overview of the Statistics Used for Comparing Discharge and Pumpage ................................... ............................... <br />9. Relation of ground -water pumpage from inline totalizing flowmeter to the differences in pumpage <br />Comparison of Instantaneous Ground -Water Discharge Measurements ................................................ <br />............................... <br />11 <br />PrimaryResults ............................................................................................................................. <br />............................... <br />12 <br />12 <br />Detailsof Analysis and Results .................................................................................................... <br />............................... <br />19 <br />Temporal Variations in Power Conversion Coefficients ......................................................................... <br />............................... <br />11. Graph showing relation of the mean and standard deviation of total network pumpage, in percent, <br />Short -Term Variations in Power Conversion Coefficients ............................................................ <br />............................... <br />19 <br />Long -Term Variations in Power Conversion Coefficients ............................................................ <br />............................... <br />21 <br />Comparison of Ground -Water Pumpage Estimates ................................................................................ <br />............................... <br />25 <br />PrimaryResults ............................................................................................................................. <br />............................... <br />25 <br />25 <br />Detailsof Analysis and Results ............. ....................................................................................... <br />............................... <br />30 <br />Sources of Discrepancy Between Pumpage Estimates ........................................................................... <br />............................... <br />PrimaryResults ...............................................................................................................:............. <br />............................... <br />30 <br />31 <br />Detailsof Analysis and Results .................................................................................................... <br />............................... <br />33 <br />Estimationof Total Network Pumpage ................................................................................................... <br />............................... <br />33 <br />PrimaryResults ............................................................................................................................. <br />............................... <br />34 <br />Detailsof Analysis and Results .................................................................................................... <br />............................... <br />38 <br />Conclusions............................................................................................................................................. <br />............................... <br />39 <br />ReferencesCited ..................................................................................................................................... <br />............................... <br />FIGURES <br />1. Map showing location of study area and irrigation -wells used in the study, 1997 -98 ................ ............................... <br />2 <br />2. Graphs showing relation of instantaneous discharge measurements from totalizing flowmeter to the <br />differences in instantaneous discharge measurements between portable flowmeters and totalizing <br />flowmeters, expressed (A) in logarithmic units and (B) in gallons per minute ............................ ............................... <br />13 <br />3. Boxplots showing differences in instantaneous ground -water discharge between portable flowmeters <br />and totalizing flowmeters (A) for the entire network, (B) by portable flowmeter method, (C) by make <br />of totalizing flowmeter, and (D) by type of discharge distribution system, 1997 -98 .................. ............................... <br />15 <br />4 -9. Graphs showing: <br />4. Distribution of differences in instantaneous ground -water discharge between portable flowmeters <br />and totalizing flowmeters for network sites during 1998 .................................................... ............................... <br />16 <br />5. Power conversion coefficients (PCC) determined at network sites during 1998: (A) range in PCC <br />and(B) percent difference ........... ........................................................................................ ............................... <br />6. Seasonal distribution of power conversion coefficients (PCC) for network sites during 1998 .......................... <br />20 <br />22 <br />7. Power conversion coefficients (PCC) determined at selected network sites during 1997 and 1998 .................. <br />23 <br />8. Power conversion coefficients (PCC) at network sites: (A) 1994 -97 State - approved PCC and 1998 <br />PCC, and (B) percent difference between 1994 -97 State - approved PCC and 1998 PCC .. ............................... <br />24 <br />9. Relation of ground -water pumpage from inline totalizing flowmeter to the differences in pumpage <br />estimates between power conversion coefficient approach and totalizing flowmeters, expressed <br />(A) in logarithmic units and (B) in acre -feet ....................................................................... ............................... <br />27 <br />10. Boxplots showing differences in ground -water pumpage estimates between power conversion coefficient <br />approach and totalizing flowmeters (A) for the entire network, (B) by portable flowmeter method, <br />(C) by make of totalizing flowmeter, and (D) by type of discharge distribution system, 1998 ... ............................... <br />28 <br />11. Graph showing relation of the mean and standard deviation of total network pumpage, in percent, <br />tothe number of strata ................................................................................................................. ............................... <br />37 <br />CONTENTS III <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.