My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Comparison of Two Approaces for Determining Ground-Water Discharge and Pumpage in the Lower Arkansas River Basin Colorado 1997-98
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Comparison of Two Approaces for Determining Ground-Water Discharge and Pumpage in the Lower Arkansas River Basin Colorado 1997-98
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2012 3:06:18 PM
Creation date
8/20/2012 1:52:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Comparison of Two Approaces for Determining Ground-Water Discharge and Pumpage in the Lower Arkansas River Basin Colorado 1997-98
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Author
Dash, Russell; Troutman, Brent; Edelmann, Patrick
Title
Comparison of Two Approaces for Determining Ground-Water Discharge and Pumpage in the Lower Arkansas River Basin Colorado 1997-98
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
0.25 <br />0.20 <br />0.15 <br />0.10 <br />0.05 <br />0 <br />-0.05 <br />-0.10 <br />-0.15 <br />-0.20 <br />-0.25 <br />0.25 <br />F <br />0.20 <br />U <br />0.15 <br />�a <br />Q <br />0.10 <br />w <br />P4 0.05 <br />x <br />U <br />Q 0 <br />w <br />Q -0.05 <br />a <br />Z -0.10 <br />4 <br />n <br />j -0.15 <br />-0.20 <br />-025 <br />IA <br />(747) <br />ENTIRE <br />NETWORK <br />� <br />�(5044) <br />L � <br />l.. <br />ra <br />_t <br />_t <br />-C <br />-C <br />(247) (287) (213) <br />� B � <br />(161) (36) <br />P C M <br />PORTABLE FLOWMETER METHOD <br />(46) (449) <br />y <br />0.25 <br />0.20 <br />0.15 <br />0.10 <br />0.05 <br />0 <br />-0.05 <br />-0.10 <br />-0.15 <br />-0.20 <br />-0.25 <br />�D <br />EXPLANATION <br />(247) Number of observations <br />Data values outside the <br />10th and 90th percentiles <br />90th percentile <br />75th percentile <br />Median <br />25th percentile <br />10th percentile <br />PORTABLE FLOWMETER METHOD: <br />P= Polysonic; C= Collins; M= McCrometer <br />MAKE OF TOTALIZING FLOWMETER: <br />M= McCrometer, S= Signet; <br />X= preexisting McCrometer; B= Badger <br />TYPE OF DISCHARGE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: <br />0= open; L= low pressure; S= sprinkler <br />C= complex <br />(93) (85) (120) <br />M S X B U L S C <br />MAKE OF TOTALIZING FLOWMETER TYPE OF DISCHARGE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM <br />Figure 3. Boxplots showing differences in instantaneous ground -water discharge between portable flowmeters and <br />totalizing flowmeters (A) for the entire network, (B) by portable flowmeter method, (C) by make of totalizing flowmeter, <br />and (D) by type of discharge distribution system, 1997 -98. <br />COMPARISON OF INSTANTANEOUS GROUND -WATER DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS 15 <br />J# <br />i <br />M S X B U L S C <br />MAKE OF TOTALIZING FLOWMETER TYPE OF DISCHARGE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM <br />Figure 3. Boxplots showing differences in instantaneous ground -water discharge between portable flowmeters and <br />totalizing flowmeters (A) for the entire network, (B) by portable flowmeter method, (C) by make of totalizing flowmeter, <br />and (D) by type of discharge distribution system, 1997 -98. <br />COMPARISON OF INSTANTANEOUS GROUND -WATER DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.