Laserfiche WebLink
proportional to the water velocity, and mean water <br />velocity multiplied by the cross - sectional area of the <br />pipe is the instantaneous discharge. <br />The second type of portable flowmeter was <br />an ultrasonic flowmeter. Typical accuracy of an ultra- <br />sonic flowmeter is reportedly 1 to 5 percent (Omega <br />Engineering Inc., 1992). An ultrasonic flowmeter <br />manufactured by Polysonic, hereinafter referred to <br />as method "P ", was used in this study and uses the <br />transit -time method for flow measurement. Two trans- <br />ducers were mounted on the outside of the discharge <br />pipe and functioned alternately as a transmitter and a <br />receiver of ultrasonic signals sent upstream and down- <br />stream through the pipe. The time difference between <br />the signals, averaged in the upstream and downstream <br />directions, is proportional to the velocity of water flow. <br />The flowmeter was programmed to process the infor- <br />mation and output a discharge value every minute. <br />Generally, 10 or more of the discharge readings were <br />averaged to obtain the instantaneous discharge. Diag- <br />nostic menus were used to determine the acceptability <br />during each test. Diagnostic parameters such as signal <br />strength and a difference count were supplied by the <br />equipment and had to be within specified limits to be a <br />valid well discharge measurement. <br />The third portable flowmeter was a typical <br />propeller -type flowmeter manufactured by <br />McCrometer, hereinafter referred to as method "M ". <br />The propeller -type flowmeter was mounted to the end <br />of a section of plastic pipe with sufficient upstream <br />length and attached with a rubber coupler to the open <br />end of the discharge pipe to make a discharge <br />measurement. During each site visit, well discharge <br />measurements were made with a method M portable <br />flowmeter by reading registers dials of the TFM and <br />timing the index wheel for one complete revolution, <br />and dividing the indicated volume by the elapsed <br />time. Generally, 10 readings were made at each site <br />and the recorded discharge was the average of the <br />10 values. <br />Power Conversion Calculations and <br />Computations of Pumpage <br />The PCC is defined as the number of kilo - <br />watthours required to pump 1 acre -ft of water. Elec- <br />trical power meters contain a disk that revolves as <br />electricity passes through the meter. During a site <br />visit, the meter disk was timed with a stopwatch for <br />10 complete disk revolutions to measure the rate per <br />revolution. This rate measurement was repeated three <br />times and used to determine the average rate of a disk <br />revolution. Power demand, in kilowatts, was calcu- <br />lated from the equation: <br />power demand = (rate) x (3.6) x (Kh factor), (1) <br />where <br />rate = average time of disk revolution, in <br />revolutions per second, <br />3.6 = conversion factor (kilowatt seconds <br />per watthour), and <br />Kh factor = watthours per revolution (imprinted <br />on the front of power meter). <br />Determining the PCC combines a concurrent measure- <br />ment of well discharge (in gallons per minute) with the <br />power demand of the pump (in kilowatts). <br />The PCC, in kilowatthours per acre -foot, is then <br />calculated from the equation: <br />PCC = (power demand) x (5433)/(well discharge), (2) <br />where <br />5433 = conversion factor (in gallon hours <br />per acre -foot minutes), and <br />well discharge = instantaneous ground -water <br />discharge, in gallons per minute. <br />A PCC was computed for every instantaneous <br />discharge measurement that was made at a well. The <br />PCC's derived in 1997 and in 1998 were used to eval- <br />uate temporal variations in the PCC data. However, <br />because the majority of PLC's were measured late in <br />the 1997 irrigation season, only the PCC's determined <br />from the 1998 measurements were used to compute <br />ground -water pumpage estimates for each well and to <br />compare differences in total pumpage between the <br />TFM and PCC approaches. <br />Pumpage estimates were calculated using every <br />PCC measurement made at a well during 1998. This <br />was done by dividing the total 1998 power consumed, <br />in kilowatthours, by each unique PCC measurement <br />made at the well during 1998. The number of kilo - <br />watthours used between onsite visits was determined <br />by reading the electric meter at the beginning of a site <br />visit. The total electrical power used was determined <br />from readings of the electrical meter at the beginning <br />METHODS OF INVESTIGATION <br />