My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Otero/Aurora Issues Remain: Tribune-Democrat
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Otero/Aurora Issues Remain: Tribune-Democrat
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2012 2:38:52 PM
Creation date
8/16/2012 2:30:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Otero/Aurora Issues Remain: Tribune-Democrat
State
CO
Date
9/28/2001
Author
Rich, Andrea
Title
Otero/Aurora Issues Remain: Tribune-Democrat
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
_7, b1- -�)- "0c'�_P\ \_ <br />0 -2�_-(2)'\N <br />Otero/ <br />• Conservancy <br />districumay go <br />forward <br />Aurot.,a <br />ing a final agreement and will meet <br />in a special"SECWCD meeting <br />Oct. 4 at 9 am. in the district office <br />in Pueblo. <br />Two months ago, the district and <br />By ANDREA RICH Aurora had several unresolved <br />It is unclear whether the unre- issues, and one of those was the <br />solved issues between the city of fact that Otero and Aurora hadn't <br />Aurora and Otero County will'stop come to their own agreement. <br />the Southeast Water Conservancy Otero County placed a list of <br />District from finalizing its inter- demands on Aurora to compensate <br />governmental agreement, with for the loss of economy if that city <br />Aurora on Oct. 4. - - moves the majority of the Rocky <br />SECWCD has been negotiating Ford Ditch out of the valley (the <br />issues on the use of Pueblo Reser- case is pending in water court). <br />voir and -possible participation in Aurora and Otero County negotiat- <br />the expansion of, the reservoir by ed through last spring before a <br />Aurora. The two entities are near- breakdown in communication <br />X51 <br />• <br />I.Ssue,s,.. <br />stalled efforts to reach an agree- <br />ment. Last month Aurora.took the <br />responsibility, for that breakdown in <br />communication and talks resumed.' <br />Some issues have been settled, <br />but others remain at an impasse. In <br />a meeting in Pueblo Wednesday <br />(Sept. 26) described as `.`a roller <br />coaster of emotion by SECWCD <br />General Manager Steve <br />Arveschoug, there "were ,high <br />points and there were low points" <br />when Otero and Aurora negotiated <br />once again, with SECWCD,serving <br />as the mediator. - <br />".I think they will eventually <br />reach an agreement," Arveschoug <br />said of Aurora and Otero. "I think <br />remain <br />the commissioners are representing <br />their constituents well." <br />When asked if Aurora and <br />Otero's impasse will stop the dis- <br />trict from, signing,an intergovern- <br />mental agreement as proposed Oct. <br />4, Arveschoug said "not necessari- <br />ly." He plans to present an IGA to <br />the district board that is a product <br />of multiple meetings with Aurora <br />representatives, including Doug <br />Kemper, the acting water utilities <br />director for. Aurora. Arveschoug <br />said he 'will present. an IGA and <br />inform the board of any progress <br />Otero and Aurora have made, and <br />Please see ISSUES page 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.