Laserfiche WebLink
• (o �-e <br />W11. ;` � a v�c <br />receive w <br />1 from DLolores <br />. <br />R* <br />fiver call <br />BY STEVE GRAZIER tors does not suggest a limit of <br />JOURNAL STAFF WRITER MVIC's storage operations into <br />non- project facilities. The <br />The issue of releasing water water now stored in McPhee f <br />from McPhee Reservoir into under the present call should <br />Narraguinnep Reservoir, fol- be released to Narraguinnep. <br />lowing a Montezuma Valley In the future, every effort.will <br />Irrigation Company call on the be made by DWCD to avoid the <br />Dolores. River in February, was. necessity to place a call on the <br />resolved at the Dolores Water Dolores River to provide for <br />Conservancy District board of storage. in Narraguinnep. <br />directors Thursday evening — *Accounting for Narraguin- <br />at least for this year. nep operations should be <br />Additionally, DWCD has enhanced to include: Inflows, <br />scheduled a special meeting daily reservoir elevation and <br />May 2 to determine when to releases, so that we (DWCD) <br />begin diverting Dolores Project are assured Narraguinnep is <br />water to full- service users for operating within the limits of <br />irrigation purposes, as the dis'- the fill and refill water rights, <br />triet continues to deal with a and MVIC's 150,400 acre -foot <br />plethora of water issues Water year maximum. <br />brought on by the region's *An analysis of 2002 opera- <br />four-year drought. tions at Narraguinnep should <br />Following an executive ses- be conducted. <br />Sion, the DWCD Board an- *DWCD should meet with <br />pounced and defined its posi MVIC to consider potential <br />tion regarding the MVIC's stor- changes to the allocation tem- <br />age operations for Narra -guin- Plate, specifically to address <br />nep, or the call MVIC placed on how we (DWCD) account for <br />the Dolores River_Feb. 21. water delivered to or released <br />The decision was based on a from Narraguinnep, and other <br />legal interpretation by Bureau issues that have been raised as <br />of Reclamation attorneys that a result of the 2002 drought. <br />MVIC's decision to place the This dialogue and any potential <br />call on the Dolores River was changes would be in prepara -. <br />valid. tion for the 2004 water year. <br />The motion passed. unani- After the motion was read <br />-mousl b th _ and approved, Bureau of Re- <br />y � r e, � Z" , clamation Operations' and <br />four. concerns. <br />*MVIC's storage operations Maintenance Officer Vern Har- <br />under its Narraguinnep water rell announced the reclamation <br />rights are not clearly limited to lawyer's interpretation of the <br />April, May and June in the DWCD /MVIC contract in con - <br />DWCD/MVIC contract, and the Junction with MVIC's call on <br />intent of the contract negotia- See WATER on Page 3A <br />