My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Water Discharge is a Pollutant, Appeals Court Says: Land Letter
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Water Discharge is a Pollutant, Appeals Court Says: Land Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2012 10:12:31 AM
Creation date
8/15/2012 3:00:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Water Discharge is a Pollutant, Appeals Court Says: Land Letter
State
CO
Date
4/17/2003
Author
Gable, Eryn
Title
Water Discharge is a Pollutant, Appeals Court Says: Land Letter
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
N. PLAINS RESOURCE v. FIDELITY EXPLORATION 4817 <br />discharge does not increase the concentration of a particular <br />parameter does not exempt it from permitting requirements." <br />The MDEQ responded, resisting revocation of the section 75- <br />5- 401(1)(b) exemption and arguing that "the exemption is <br />consistent with federal requirements governing NPDES pro- <br />grams because discharges of unaltered, natural groundwater <br />do not contain `pollutants' as that term is defined under the <br />Clean Water Act." In a final letter sent to the MDEQ by the <br />EPA, the EPA reiterated its objection to section 75-5 - <br />401(1)(b) if applied to discharges that would otherwise <br />require a permit under the CWA. <br />Even though MDEQ informed Fidelity in August 1998 that <br />Montana state law exempted the discharge of unaltered <br />groundwater, Fidelity filed MPDES permit applications in <br />January 1999. At that time, Fidelity was discharging into both <br />Squirrel Creek and the Tongue River without a permit. <br />NPRC sent a 60 -day Notice of Intent to Sue letter to Fidel- <br />ity, the MDEQ, and the EPA on April 18, 2000. NPRC <br />alleged unpermitted discharges of pollutants into Squirrel <br />Creek and the Tongue River. On June 23, 2000, NPRC filed <br />a citizen suit under the CWA in federal district court alleging <br />unpermitted discharges into Squirrel Creek. An amended <br />complaint was filed on June 26, 2000, to add allegations of <br />unlawful discharges into the Tongue River from outfalls not <br />covered by an MPDES permit? <br />2 O June 16, 2000, the MDEQ issued Fidelity an MPDES permit autho- <br />rizing Fidelity to discharge into the Tongue from seven specified outfalls. <br />The MDEQ did not issue a permit to discharge into Squirrel Creek. Even <br />though the MPDES permit allowed discharge into the Tongue River from <br />seven outfalls, Fidelity discharged from twelve outfalls and continued to <br />do so until the MDEQ amended the permit on July 3, 2000, to allow dis- <br />charge from ten outfalls. Fidelity did not receive an amended permit <br />allowing discharge from ten outfalls until after the amended complaint <br />was filed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.