My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Water Discharge is a Pollutant, Appeals Court Says: Land Letter
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Water Discharge is a Pollutant, Appeals Court Says: Land Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2012 10:12:31 AM
Creation date
8/15/2012 3:00:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Water Discharge is a Pollutant, Appeals Court Says: Land Letter
State
CO
Date
4/17/2003
Author
Gable, Eryn
Title
Water Discharge is a Pollutant, Appeals Court Says: Land Letter
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, Land Letter <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />"Industrial waste is not limited to only the most heinous and toxic forms of industrial byproducts," the court <br />ruled. The dictionary defines industrial as "of, pertaining to, or derived from industry," it said. <br />The court disagreed with Fidelity's argument that methane water is not a pollutant because it is unaltered <br />groundwater. Not considering methane water a pollutant "would allow someone to pipe the Atlantic Ocean <br />into the Great Lakes and then argue that there is no liability under the CWA because the salt water from the <br />Atlantic Ocean was not altered before being discharged into the fresh waters of the Great Lakes," the court <br />said. <br />Fidelity already tests its water, sending samples to third -party labs, to ensure that it is not exceeding <br />standards or causing degradation to the water. "We've always been well within compliance with any <br />standards," Caskey said. <br />Fidelity, a subsidiary of MDU Resources Group Inc., said the ruling will not affect how it conducts its <br />business in Montana and should not significantly affect its future operations. The company also does not <br />expect to face fines for CWA violations, but NPRC's Amy Frykman said fines are mandatory under the <br />CWA. Fidelity's legal team is currently reviewing the decision, Caskey said. <br />Northern Plains said the ruling should help ensure Montana's water is protected as methane development <br />advances in the state. The Bureau of Land Management is expected to release separate records of decision <br />for the Montana and Wyoming portions of the Powder River Basin, which straddles the two states, by the <br />end of the month. <br />Environmentalists and irrigators are also contesting Fidelity's permit, which allows them to discharge 1,600 <br />gallons of water per minute. <br />Click here to download the ruling. <br />ENVIRONMENT & ENERGY DAILY * GREENWIRE * LAND LETTER * E &E PUBLISHING, LLC <br />122 C. St. NW, Ste. 722 Washington, D.C. 20001 <br />E -mail: pubs@eenews.net * Phone: 202- 628 -6500 <br />All contents O 2003 E &E Publishing, LLC. <br />http: / /www.eenews. net/ LandletterBackissues /041703/04170306.htm 4/17/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.