Laserfiche WebLink
4826 N. PLAINS RESOURCE v. FIDELITY EXPLORATION <br />coning that the EPA implicitly approved of Montana's <br />groundwater exemption because the EPA did not revoke <br />Montana's authority to operate the EPA - approved state per- <br />mitting program despite section 75- 5- 401(1)(b). Giving defer- <br />ence to the EPA's "approval" of Montana's permitting <br />program, the district court concluded that discharge of CBM <br />water does not require a permit under Montana state law and <br />thus does not violate the CWA. We disagree with the district <br />court's conclusion for several reasons. <br />[9] First, though the district court reasoned that the EPA <br />approved of section 75- 5- 401(1)(b), the EPA does not have <br />the authority to exempt discharges otherwise subject to the <br />CWA. Only Congress may amend the CWA to create exemp- <br />tions from regulation. See Am. Mining Congress v. E.P.A., <br />965 F.2d 759, 772 (9th Cir. 1992) (citing Natural Res. Def. <br />Council v. Costle, 568 F.2d 1369, 1374 (D.C. Cir. 1977)). The <br />EPA could not have approved of the MDEQ's exemption of <br />CBM water discharges under section 75- 5- 401(1)(b) even if <br />the EPA wanted to do SO .4 <br />[10] Second, Montana has no authority to create a permit <br />exemption from the CWA for discharges that would otherwise <br />be subject to the NPDES permitting process. See 33 U.S.C. <br />§ 1370 (states may not adopt or enforce standards that are less <br />stringent than federal standards). Just as the EPA does not <br />have the authority to create an exemption for unaltered <br />groundwater, neither does the State of Montana, as the EPA <br />4Judicial deference to agency action is not warranted where the agency <br />had no authority to act. See United States v. Mead, 533 U.S. 218, 226 -27 <br />(2001) (Chevron deference applies only when Congress explicitly or <br />implicitly gave the agency authority to fill certain gaps left by Congress). <br />Therefore, the district court erred in giving judicial deference to the EPA's <br />implicit "approval" of Montana's groundwater exemption. Congress did <br />not grant the EPA the authority to create such exemptions. <br />