Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 of 3 <br />"Demands on water are going to be increasing as the population increases. You can't solve the problem once the <br />crisis hits," Norton said. "Last year's tremendous drought across the west ... was a dramatic warning signal that <br />we need to think ahead. <br />"Water experts say the emphasis on sharing and conserving is an unusual step for the federal government to <br />take. <br />"Refreshing," said David Getches, a University of Colorado law professor and authority on western water. "They <br />don't say we need to build more buckets to put water in, water that we know isn't going to come from nature. It <br />focuses on population growth. This is the big problem in the west." <br />© Copyright 2003 USA TODAY, a division of " http : / /www.gannett.com / " >Gannett Co. Inc <br />Friday, May 02, <br />2003 <br />Department Identifies Likely Sites of Western Water Wars <br />By SETH HETTENA I Associated Press <br />Interior <br />SAN DIEGO - The Interior Department has identified cities across the West that are likely to experience conflicts <br />over water during the next 25 years. <br />The department's map shows Western communities where conflict is "highly likely" by 2025: Las Vegas, Carson <br />City, Nev.; Albuquerque, N.M.; Denver; Houston and Salt Lake City. <br />"In some areas of the West, existing water supplies are, or will be, inadequate to meet the demands for water for <br />people, cities, farms and the environment even under normal supply conditions," according to the Interior <br />Department. <br />Explosive growth across the West is straining water resources that also support billion - dollar farm economies and <br />are crucial to maintaining the survival of a host of endangered species. <br />On the department's map, two of the West's main waterways, the Rio Grande and the Colorado River, were <br />marked in red as highly likely sources of future conflict. <br />There was a "substantial" possibility of water wars in other Western cities, including Los Angeles, Sacramento, <br />San Diego, Phoenix, San Antonio among others, according to the department's map, a copy of which was made <br />available to The Associated Press. <br />A third level of cities had a "moderate" chance of future conflict, including Seattle; Dallas; Casper, Wyo.; Boise, <br />Idaho; Salem, Ore. <br />Interior Secretary Gale Norton ordered her staff to develop the map of potential future hot spots in the hopes of <br />averting a repeat of the crisis in the Klamath Basin in 2001. Armed federal officers were called in to protect <br />supplies from farmers angry over the Interior Department's decision to cut off their water to protect endangered <br />salmon. The Klamath River had a "substantial" possibility for sparking conflict again by 2025, according to the <br />Interior Department. <br />Another water war erupted this year in California, after the state failed to meet a Dec. 31 deadline to sign a deal <br />aimed at reducing the state's historic overdependence on the Colorado River. In response, Norton reduced the <br />amount of water California can draw from the Colorado River this year by 600,000 acre -feet, enough water for 1.2 <br />million people. <br />"Crisis management is not an effective solution for addressing long -term systematic water supply problems," <br />Norton said in a statement. <br />5/5/2003 <br />