My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Southeastern Coloraodo Water Conservancy District 2002 Annual Report
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
6001-7000
>
Southeastern Coloraodo Water Conservancy District 2002 Annual Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 3:46:51 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 1:37:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Southeastern Coloraodo Water Conservancy District 2002 Annual Report
State
CO
Title
Southeastern Coloraodo Water Conservancy District 2002 Annual Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Senate Bill 141 required that appointments be made based upon population within individual counties, and <br />counties with less than one percent would be excluded from having a member on the board. This would change <br />the composition of the Southeastern District's board over a period of four years by reducing the representation <br />from Bent, Chaffee, Crowley, Fremont, and Otero Counties from two directors to one; with representation from <br />Kiowa /Prowers Counties staying at one; increasing the representation from El Paso County from two to five <br />directors; Pueblo County from two to three; and one at -large position. Senate Bill 141 also provided that the new <br />legislation could be instituted by legal entities within the District petitioning the Court, or petitions being filed with <br />an appropriate number of signatures. <br />On August 13, 1985 the City of Colorado Springs and the Board of Water Works of Pueblo filed appropriate <br />petitions with the District Court requesting that the provisions of Senate Bill 141 be implemented in the <br />Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District. The Honorable Richard Robb held several hearings on the <br />petitions, giving representatives from Chaffee, Fremont, and Kiowa Counties the opportunity to express concern <br />over the loss of members on the board of directors. After due consideration, Judge Robb ruled on December <br />11, 1985 that the provisions of Senate Bill 141 should apply to the District. He then promulgated a procedure <br />whereby appointments in 1986 would conform with those provisions. <br />401h ANNIVERSARY <br />FRYINGPAN- ARKANSAS PROJECT <br />August 16, 1962 will be a date recorded in the history books as the day when the members of Congress of <br />the United States and the late John F. Kenney, President of the United States, authorized the construction of the <br />Fryingpan- Arkansas Project, which would change the water management programs for the better for years to <br />come. Public Law 87 -590, authorized the construction and operation of the multipurpose project. On January 21, <br />1965, the members of the board of directors of the District entered into a Repayment Contract with the United <br />States to repay the reimbursable costs involved in the construction. The final Repayment Contract was signed <br />between the District and the United States on October 23, 1981. <br />Construction on the Fryingpan- Arkansas Project began on Ruedi Reservoir in 1964, and continued at a steady <br />pace every year. The Project was declared complete in 1982, with the exception of the completion of the second <br />unit at the Mt. Elbert Power Plant. Four different Presidents of the United States served during the construction <br />period, and many water resource programs were changed during the 20 years, including passage of the National <br />Environment Policy Act in 1969, the Federal Energy Act of 1973, and the President Jimmy Carter "Hit List" in <br />1977. Changing economic times saw the inflation and interest rates skyrocket to amounts unprecedented in <br />history, and an environmental movement throughout the United States opposing such projects. <br />The District and the Bureau of Reclamation officials were indeed fortunate that the members of Congress and <br />the Presidents of the United States continued their support for the Fryingpan- Arkansas Project. <br />7 • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.