Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 of 6 <br />From Denver Water's perspective, the utility is trying to fix a bottleneck in the northern part of its <br />system by funneling more water to its Moffat treatment plant. Currently, some metro customers <br />could lose service if a fire or accident disabled the Foothills or Marston treatment facilities. <br />But to increase the capacity of the Moffat facility, Denver needs to store more water in its <br />northern system, and that means bringing more Fraser River water to the east slope. <br />Denver Water officials point out that the utility has taken a number of voluntary steps to aid <br />Fraser River communities. On four of the 30 diversions in the valley, Denver releases enough <br />water to keep downstream fish alive in winter and summer. Several years ago, the utility agreed <br />to give Winter Park 900 more acre -feet per year. <br />And this spring, when the utility shut down bypass flows to maximize its own storage, it agreed it <br />would release additional water if Winter Park faces shortages. <br />"We understand they're trying to solve their problems and not kill us in the meantime," <br />Teverbaugh said. "We're trying to make sure that doesn't happen either." <br />But Denver Water's first priority remains serving its own customers, Little said. <br />"There is a tension between what's best for our customers and what Grand County perceives it <br />needs for their recreation economy," Little said. <br />The utility's manager, Chips Barry, said Winter Park's beef isn't so much with Denver as it is with <br />state water law. <br />"What they're complaining about is ... the pinch that comes from the prior appropriation <br />doctrine," Barry said. "Everyone who has to deal with it claims at one time or another it isn't fair. <br />Besides, they all know the only people who can do anything to help them is Denver Water." <br />But Denver's diversions have already forced Winter Park, the town of Fraser and other <br />communities to build a sophisticated $20 million regional sewage treatment plant to comply with <br />state pollution laws. The reason: Releases of treated sewage violated state water quality laws <br />because the Fraser runs so low. <br />The new debt from the sewage plant has further reduced the small towns' ability to pay for new <br />water supply projects. <br />Teverbaugh doesn't dispute that Denver has a legitimate right to the water. <br />"I'm arguing that the water on the West Slope is an asset to the Front Range that needs to be <br />protected," he said. "And I think it's unfair for Denver to say, 'Build -out is a God -given right on <br />the Front Range. "' <br />Opening taps for growth <br />Some Denver Water officials suggest Grand County should have taken a harder look at its water <br />supply before establishing development targets. <br />However, since 2000, Denver Water has added more than 16,000 taps, a 5.7 percent increase. In <br />2002, the drought's worst year, Denver added almost 10,000 new taps - even as it was <br />drastically cutting back releases to the Fraser for six months. <br />By contrast, the stagnating economy has reduced demand in Hutchins' Grand County Water and <br />http: / /www.denverpost.com /cda/article /print /0, 1674 ,36 %7E23447 %7E2335775,00.html 8/16/2004 <br />