My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Fiscal Year 2003: Performance Report U.S. Department of Agricultire Natural Resources Conservation Service
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Fiscal Year 2003: Performance Report U.S. Department of Agricultire Natural Resources Conservation Service
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2012 2:44:11 PM
Creation date
8/14/2012 1:47:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Fiscal Year 2003: Performance Report U.S. Department of Agricultire Natural Resources Conservation Service
State
CO
Date
3/1/2003
Title
Fiscal Year 2003: Performance Report U.S. Department of Agricultire Natural Resources Conservation Service
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
We helped farmers and ranchers <br />develop conservation plans for a total of <br />11.7 million acres of cropland and 22.2 <br />million acres of grazing land. We helped <br />them apply conservation practices on 10.8 <br />million acres of cropland and 19.8 million <br />acres of grazing land. The land on which <br />conservation was applied made up 2.7 <br />percent of the Nation's cropland and <br />Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) <br />land and 5.8 percent of the Nation's <br />rangeland and pastureland. <br />On about 60 percent of the land where <br />practices were applied, the conservation <br />system provides what conservationists call <br />the "resource management system" or <br />"RMS" level of protection (Table 1 and <br />Figure 3.) This means that all conserva- <br />tion measures needed to fully protect the <br />resource base against the problems identi- <br />fied for the site have been planned and <br />applied. <br />Much of the help we provide to pro- <br />ducers who want to adopt these compre- <br />hensive systems is provided through the <br />Conservation Technical Assistance pro- <br />gram, which is the source of the basic sci- <br />ence -based information and expertise <br />needed for sustainable resource use. <br />Table 1. Cropland and grazing land on which conservation was applied in FY 2003 with <br />NRCS assistance. <br />Performance Goals Performance Indicators FY2003 FY2003 <br />Target Actual <br />Million acres <br />Maintain, restore, and Cropland where resource 6.29 6.69 <br />enhance the productive management systems <br />capacity of cropland were applied <br />Maintain, restore, and Grazing land where 10.32 11.89 <br />enhance the productive resource management <br />capacity of grazing land systems were applied <br />Figure 3. Acreage treated with NRCS assistance in fiscal years 2000 -2003, million acres. <br />20 — - <br />18 Cropland Treated to RMS Grazing Land Treated to RMS <br />Cropland Treated, less than RMS O Grazing Land Treated, <br />16 less than RMS <br />14 <br />12 <br />10 <br />0 <br />FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 <br />Source: NRCS Performance and Results Measurement System. <br />Fiscal Year 2003 Performance Report <br />Conservation Planning <br />Is Fundamental <br />"We knew we'd face some challenges <br />when looking to diversify our opera- <br />tion while protecting our natural <br />resources," they said. "But the conser- <br />vation planning process provided by <br />NRCS has been the best tool for help- <br />ing us work through all the issues asso- <br />ciated with reaching our conservation <br />goals." <br />A farm family in Towner County, <br />North Dakota, comments on the con- <br />servation technical assistance they <br />receive from NRCS. <br />The farm has an EQIP contract that <br />has been instrumental in the success of <br />their elk operation, in addition to the <br />technical assistance they received for <br />their crop residue management of <br />wheat, canola, and sunflowers, along <br />with a prescribed grazing system that <br />included cross fencing, pipelines, <br />tanks, and grass plantings. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.