My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Arizona Water Resource Volume 11 Number 4
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Arizona Water Resource Volume 11 Number 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2012 2:49:08 PM
Creation date
8/14/2012 1:20:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Arizona Water Resource Volume 11 Number 4
State
AZ
Date
5/1/2003
Title
Arizona Water Resource Volume 11 Number 4
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2 Arizona Water Resource May - June 2003 <br />Desalination... continued from page 1 <br />landlocked Arizona will not be desalinating <br />seawater. The value of inland brackish water <br />as a water supply is being increasingly rec- <br />ognized. It is a resource that previously had <br />been overlooked since other higher- quality, <br />more potable water supplies were available. <br />With supplies of such waters now more <br />limited brackish water is attracting attention <br />as a potential drinking water source. <br />It is Arizona's involvement in the poli- <br />tics of salinity at the international level that <br />distinguishes the state's situation. In this are- <br />na, Arizona's involvement with salinity and <br />salinity control predates the current interest. <br />Through its participation in the Colorado <br />River Basin Salinity Control Forum Arizona <br />has been active in desalination strategies <br />since 1975. <br />The seven basin states created the fo- <br />rum in response to the political crisis arising <br />when Mexico objected to the salinity levels <br />of the Colorado River as its waters entered <br />the country. The forum's intent was to <br />reduce salinity and recommend water qual- <br />ity standards for various points along the <br />Colorado River. The issue was water qual- <br />ity, and the goal was to reduce the amount <br />of salt entering the river from the upper <br />basin states. Strategies included encouraging <br />on -farm irrigation efficiencies to control <br />salinity and taking measure to prevent saline <br />groundwater from entering the river. <br />Recently Arizona's interest in the Colo- <br />rado River salinity issue has acquired a new <br />focus due to its concern about ensuring the <br />state's supply of Colorado River water. Un- <br />like other areas of the country where new <br />desalination plants are being proposed, at <br />issue in Arizona is the operation of a plant <br />that was constructed over ten years ago. The <br />state is urging the U.S. Bureau of Reclama- <br />tion to put the Yuma desalination plant on <br />line. To Arizona, desalination in this situa- <br />tion is a water supply issue. <br />The plant was constructed to reclaim <br />drainage water from the Wellton- Mohawk <br />Irrigation District, to ensure that water de- <br />livered to Mexico is suitable for beneficial <br />use. Per treaty obligation, the United States <br />is to ensure delivery of 1,500,000 acre -feet <br />of water each year. Drainage from the ir- <br />ritation district averages more than 100,000 <br />acre -feet per year which, because of its <br />high salinity, was unsuitable for delivery <br />to Mexico. In what was to be a temporary <br />solution to the problem, drainage water was <br />bypassed around the Mexican diversion at <br />Morelos Dam, with the 100,000 acre -feet <br />not figuring into the Mexican Colorado <br />River allocation. <br />That the wastewater was being by- <br />passed was not a critical issue at one time <br />since there were abundant flows on the <br />Colorado River during most of the 1990s, <br />and the Lower Basin States were not using <br />their full 7.5 million acre -feet allocation. <br />Operation of the plant therefore, which was <br />completed in 1992, was not critical. Times <br />have changed, however, with water supplies <br />back to normal and lower basin states' water <br />demands in excess of compact apportion- <br />ments. Meanwhile the upper basin demands <br />continue to grow. <br />Arizona argues that the bypassed water <br />is in a sense a lost opportunity, its flows not <br />credited as part of Mexico's entitlement. It <br />says that delivery of water in excess of trea- <br />ty requirements will result in an increased <br />frequency of water supply shortages in the <br />United States. Arizona water users stand to <br />be hurt the most since the Central Arizona <br />Project is junior to all other water users in <br />the Lower Basin. <br />The federal government is balking at <br />starting up the plant, offering instead to <br />retire Arizona and California farmland to <br />free up additional water supplies. Arizona <br />doubts this a workable strategy and is urg- <br />ing the operation of the plant. This is a very <br />controversial issue since the bypassed water <br />has environmental value in maintaining the <br />Cienga de Santa Clara in Mexico. If the <br />plant were operating, the reduced wastewa- <br />ter then flowing to the cenga would greatly <br />increase in salinity, posing a threat to the <br />wetlands. <br />While desalination of Colorado River <br />water is debated officials in central Arizona <br />are pondering their salinity concerns and <br />the possible role of desalination. The area is <br />plagued by a salt loading problem, with the <br />diversion and use of surface water resulting <br />in an accumulation of salts. Phoenix area <br />water officials have organized the Central <br />Arizona Salinity Study to investigate the <br />worsening problem. <br />Steve Rossi, the principal water re- <br />sources planner for the City of Phoenix, <br />says phase one of the study has been an <br />Continued on page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.