Laserfiche WebLink
6.0 SURFACE -WATER QUALITY -- Continued <br />6.5 Biological Quality <br />Aquatic Organisms Are Indicators of Stream Quality <br />Stream quality is reflected by the diversity of aquatic organisms. <br />In general, streams having a diversity index of 3 <br />or 4 are likely to be relatively free of waste materials <br />(Wilhm, 1970, p. R223). Diversity index is a method <br />of relating the number of organisms to the number of <br />species. Where the diversity index is less than 1, the <br />stream or stream reach is likely to be polluted <br />(Wilhm, 1970, p. R223). A conceptual model show- <br />ing the relationship between stream quality and <br />diversity index is illustrated in figure 6.5 -1. As the <br />quality of water in streams deteriorates, fewer species <br />of organisms are able to survive, and the population <br />of the remaining organisms tends to increase because <br />of less competition. Most aquatic organisms are <br />somewhat immobile and, therefore, reflect the condi- <br />tions in a stream over a long time. Temporal changes <br />in stream velocity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, <br />chemical quality, and sediment concentrations can <br />affect the aquatic community structure. <br />The taxonomic group which is more abundant <br />than others in a particular community is referred to <br />as the dominant taxon. The dominant taxon general- <br />ly indicates which species is thriving during some <br />given period and, with limitations, may be used for <br />assessing water quality. <br />Of those organisms found in Area 61, stoneflies, <br />mayflies, and caddisflies are considered sensitive to <br />instream changes such as increasing concentrations in <br />organic waste and sediment and decreasing dis- <br />62 <br />solved- oxygen concentrations. Scud, snails, and <br />craneflies are somewhat less sensitive to these <br />changes; midges are considered to be tolerant of such <br />changes. <br />Biological data have been collected at 45 sites in <br />Area 61 (fig. 6.5 -2). Organisms were found to inhabit <br />all streams sampled; however, the Shannon - Wiener <br />diversity index varied greatly (0 to 3.25). The accura- <br />cy of estimating diversity decreases when samples <br />contain fewer than 100 individuals. The data in table <br />6.5 -1 were collected during three different periods <br />and by three different methods. The 1971 -72 data <br />were collected by Wentz (1974). The 1974 data were <br />collected by URS /Ken R. White Co. (1975), and the <br />1980 data were collected by the Colorado Depart- <br />ment of Health, Water Quality Control Division (J. <br />D. Gillespie, CF &I Corp., written commun., 1981). <br />Because the methods varied between sampling peri- <br />ods and the level of taxonomic classification is incon- <br />sistent, comparison between data sets was not made. <br />In general, the data indicate the stream quality is <br />such that aquatic organisms of a moderate diversity <br />inhabit the streams in Area 61. Notable exceptions <br />are in the stream reaches downstream from the <br />outflow of wastewater- treatment plants and reaches <br />upstream and downstream from Trinidad Lake, <br />Colo. <br />F <br />a <br />w <br />A <br />POOR STREAM QUALITY GOOD <br />Figure 6.5 -1 Diagram of conceptual model <br />showing stream - quality diversity relationship. <br />