My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Hydrology of Area 61, Northern Great Plains and Rocky Mountain Coal Provinces, Colorado and New Mexico
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Hydrology of Area 61, Northern Great Plains and Rocky Mountain Coal Provinces, Colorado and New Mexico
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2012 3:40:31 PM
Creation date
8/13/2012 3:25:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Hydrology of Area 61, Northern Great Plains and Rocky Mountain Coal Provinces, Colorado and New Mexico
State
CO
NM
Author
Abbott, P. O.; Geldon, Arthur; Cain, Doug; Hall, Alan; Edelmann, Patrick
Title
Hydrology of Area 61, Northern Great Plains and Rocky Mountain Coal Provinces, Colorado and New Mexico
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.0 SURFACE -WATER QUALITY -- Continued <br />6.1 Specific Conductance -- Continued <br />6.1.2 Relationship to Stream Discharge <br />Specific Conductance of Streamflow Is Inversely <br />Related to Discharge <br />Relationships between specific conductance and streamflow are <br />affected bygeology. <br />Relationships between specific conductance and <br />streamflow have been developed for the 10 stations <br />shown in figure 6.1.2 -1. The linear relationships <br />between the logarithms of discharge and specific <br />conductance were developed using the method of <br />least squares at stations where visual inspection of <br />the plotted data indicated a linear trend. The rela- <br />tionships (fig. 6.1.2 -2) are inverse; when discharge <br />increases, specific conductance decreases. The posi- <br />tion and slope of the lines in figure 6.1.2 -2 are <br />significantly affected by local bedrock geology. <br />The specific conductance of streamflow is largely <br />determined by the specific conductances of its two <br />major components -- direct runoff and base flow. <br />Direct runoff to streams occurs as a result of snow - <br />melt or rainfall runoff. Direct runoff usually has a <br />low specific conductance because the relatively pure <br />water from snowmelt or rainfall has minimal oppor- <br />tunity to dissolve salts enroute to the stream. The <br />highest discharges of streams in Area 61 generally <br />occur as a result of direct runoff, causing the curves <br />in figure 6.1.2 -2 to slope down at high discharges. <br />When direct runoff is not occurring, streamflow may <br />be maintained at base flow by ground -water inflows. <br />Because ground water is in contact with geologic <br />materials for a much longer period than direct ru'n- <br />50 <br />off, ground water generally has a higher specific <br />conductance because of dissolution of rocks and <br />minerals. The result is a greater specific conductance <br />of streamflow during base flow. <br />The specific conductance of base_ flow depends <br />on the geologic formation or formations from which <br />base flow is contributed (fig. 6.1.2 -2) at each site. <br />The highest specific conductances in base flow occur <br />at sites where the base flow originates in Cretaceous <br />rocks and the lowest at sites where base flow origi- <br />nates from igneous, metamorphic, Pennsylvanian, or <br />Permian rocks. Intermediate specific conductance <br />occurs at sites where base flow is contributed from <br />the Raton and Poison Canyon Formations. These <br />trends in the specific conductance of base flow are <br />similar to what is observed in ground -water samples <br />from wells completed in these formations. <br />The inverse relationship of specific conductance <br />to discharge and associated seasonal variations is <br />further exemplified at the streamflow- gaging station <br />on the Purgatoire River at Madrid, Colo. (fig. <br />6.1.2 -3). Similar seasonal variations can be expected <br />at other sites shown in figure 6.1.2 -1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.